Greer Donley
banner
greerdonley.bsky.social
Greer Donley
@greerdonley.bsky.social
Prof @PittLaw, writing about abortion rights, pregnancy loss & other RJ issues. Mom. Kansan. Views my own. Bylines @NYT @Atlantic & more
Thanks, @hankgreely.bsky.social!! I posted it with trepidation. I’m sure this paper will get me in trouble haha. I’m going to do a thread on it next week hopefully.
November 26, 2025 at 5:37 PM
My heart breaks for this family.
November 19, 2025 at 1:36 PM
“The pressures on a doc to decide not to perform an…abortion are…enormous, & bc [the ban] authorizes--& requires--the doc to decide, at his peril, whether an abortion is necessary, a woman whose life is at stake may be as effectively condemned to death as if the law flatly prohibited all abortions.”
November 19, 2025 at 1:36 PM
If you want to learn more about the mife REMS and why it should be removed entirely, read my article "Medication Abortion Exceptionalism" in Cornell Law Review. I actually discuss this case quite a bit, and it's awesome to finally see a summary judgment order! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Medication Abortion Exceptionalism
Though state laws dominate the abortion debate, there is a federal abortion policy that significantly curtails access to early abortion in all fifty states. The
papers.ssrn.com
October 31, 2025 at 2:08 AM
The FDA has said it is reviewing mifepristone's safety, which could be real or could be bluster. If any review is happening, this case places opposing pressure on the agency. It also potentially sets up another split if the MO and LA cases go as expected.
October 31, 2025 at 1:42 AM
It is the complete opposite of the Alliance case, but with an oddly similar holding. Though unlawful, the 2023 REMS will remain in effect. The court remanded back to the FDA to reconsider the REMS modification in light of the statutory factors and evidence it didn't properly consider.
October 31, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Indeed, the 4th Circuit will be deciding another preemption case (Bryant v. Stein) soon, which challenges North Carolina's medication abortion laws. We argue that the preemption arguments in this case are stronger & the case may come out differently. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
State Mifepristone Regulation Following GenBioPro v Raynes
This Viewpoint discusses the GenBioPro v Raynes decision and what it could mean for other cases challenging medication abortion restrictions on preemption grounds.
jamanetwork.com
October 28, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Finally, and not surprisingly, LA argues that removing the REMS is unlawful bc of Comstock. This is not new, but worth mentioning bc Comstock doesn't come up a lot these days. Here it the complaint. s3.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
s3.documentcloud.org
October 9, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Third, LA also argues it's injured b/c FDA law preempts their abortion laws. That would be great news! Unfortunately, the 4th Circuit just ruled that FDA regulation did not preempt West VA's abortion ban. More cases on that issues are coming & could turn out differently, but it's at best unsettled
October 9, 2025 at 3:50 PM