Dr Rosamund Lily West is a lecturer and architectural historian. She currently lectures at West Dean and University of the Arts London as well as leading architectural walking tours of Woolwich and Ca...

  A graduate of Queen’s University and the University of Toronto, Walter Lewis has served on the editorial board of FreshWater and is the production editor The Northern Mariner. In 1990 he took up scuba diving as part of the research for The River Palace, co-authored with Rick Neilson of Kingston and published by Dundurn in 2008.  His articles have appeared in places as varied as The Northern Mariner, FreshWater, Inland Seas,Ontario History, Beaver, Horizon Canada and the Dictionary of Canadian Biography. His website, MaritimeHistoryOfTheGreatLakes.ca is recognized as a key resource for those doing research in the history of the Great Lakes.  He is currently a member of the executive council of the Canadian Nautical Research Society and chairs the Programs, Projects & Publications committee of the Association for Great Lakes Maritime History. Among others, his current research interests include iron shipbuilding, ship repair facilities and classification societies on the Great Lakes. This post was originally posted (in a shorter form) at Stories Maritime History of the Great Lakes. Thank you very much to Walter for allowing us to post and updated version as the first entry for our ‘Academic Processes and Digital Humanities‘ series. The most important shipping business journals published in the Great Lakes region prior to the Great Depression were the Marine Record (1878 – August 1902) and the Marine Review (March 1890-October 1935). When they merged in 1902, the result was published under the somewhat awkward banner “Marine Review and Marine Record,” while keeping the volume and issue numbering of the Review. In January 1904, “Marine Record” was dropped from the title, with the Record‘s remaining legacy being the claim on the cover that the journal was “established 1878.” Five years later, in April 1909, the new owners, Penton Publishing, switched from a weekly to a monthly format, which they retained until the journal was sold and merged with Marine Engineering and Shipping Age into Marine Engineering and Shipping Review, still published, but now known as MarineLog. While Marine Engineering dates from 1897, MarineLog also chooses to celebrate its origins from the first publication of the Marine Record in 1878. Now if we could only locate some issues of the Record from before 1883. Some years ago the Center for Archival Collections at Bowling Green State University organized the microfilming of many of the early issues of both the Marine Record and the Marine Review up to end of 1902. In 2010, we added just short of 17,000 pages from that microfilm to the Maritime History of the Great Lakes website covering the years 1883-1902. Thanks to issues shared by the Dossin Museum in Detroit, along with Ron Beaupre and Greg Rudnick, I have been able to both extend the coverage of the Marine Review to its end in 1935, but also to replace all but 2500 pages of the microfilm with images from the originals. The result is just over 55,000 pages of marine journalism published in Cleveland, Ohio. The journals had deep roots in Great Lakes shipping although from World War I, there was an increasing emphasis on global developments. One question I have been asked is “why go to the time and effort to re-shoot the issues from the originals?” A couple of examples may explain why. Almost all microfilm is photographed in black and white, with an emphasis on high contrast exposures that improves the ability to read the text on standard microfilm readers. The company that digitized the BGSU microfilm emphasized this contrast in the files they produced for us. For pages from the era of woodcut engravings this is less of an concern, although the additional generation of negative/positive print before digitization can still introduce focus issues. The challenge in many films comes from shadows in gutters in instances when the paper wasn’t disbound before filming (true here). Content in those columns may come up very dark, and after digitization, black on black. In part this is because many digitization projects, especially ones done ten or more years ago, were struggling to reduce file size and assumed that bitonal (aka each pixel in the image is either black or white) images would be acceptable. In some instances they are. But with the increasing use of photographs in the 1890s, the degree of greyness at which a given point on the page was converted to either black or white, makes for some very unhappy images. The Marine Review prided itself on its illustrations. Reshooting these, not just in greyscale, but in colour restored a significant amount of detail. This was especially true, when some earlier owner of the issue marked it up with a blue or other coloured pencil. Marine Review (Cleveland, OH), 8 Mar 1900, p. 9   from microfilm from the original The conversion to bitonal files also has a significant impact on the quality of the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) of the files. This is a computer process that converts the images of the text to text that can be searched in our indexes. When, for example, letters have parts that print more faintly, or where there is bleed-through from the ink on the other side of the page, the results are far from satisfactory. Best paragraph from the Microfilm – (midpoint, left column) from reshoot of original A ILUBBY OYIB DIIY TOBTUGAB. Iuststpruentthereisalittle flurryin Wuhingtoubetween the navy department and the Marine Hospital service. navy ‘departlnent has recently yent 050.000 establishing a coding nation at Dry Tor- tuga: an In equt wha considers. u the island. the most im- rortan ‘ 1ss::erntheChesa eand Central America. A ew bp g was en rised to receive a notifiatiqn from the ta-usury department to stop war at Dr! TOTIIIEII 5! tP”‘ 1. 55 Surgeon General W needed the place to are for yellow lever and bubonic plague patients. The ma thinks that the-e are sevwal other adjacent s a avail: . ‘lfllfvgaa and will de- elinetosurrenderDry ortugasnnlesslpecl yofildtdmdoiohr lhepréktthirnlell ‘ . A FLURRY OVER DRY TORTUGAS. Just at present there is a little flurry in Washington between the navy department and the Marine Hospital service. The navy department_has recently […]

    What immediate challenges did the governments concerned face for their dockyards and shipyards? What long-term impacts resonate for them today? Signifying personal and international interest and legacy: USS Salem, US 6th Fleet flagship being lifted by AFD 35 in Grand Harbour Malta, 1956, just before the Suez crisis. Decommissioned, now at US Naval and Shipbuilding Museum, Quincy, Massachusetts, https://www.uss-salem.org/. Photo Roger Bendall, 1956. Writing a decade after the Suez crisis, one contemporary politician dismissed the affair as merely ‘the dying convulsion of the British Empire.’ This view is still widely held today, but how authentic is that interpretation in hindsight? How did the Suez crisis redefine Britain’s international identity and economic profile and its relationship with former colonies and ongoing allies? And how did it influence attitudes among Britain’s allies, including France and Israel, who had taken part, and the United States who had forced an early end to the action? Critically, how did the Suez aftermath and its often bitter recriminations shape future British naval policy on home and overseas dockyards and shipyards and their communities? Conference themes will include: Overview of how the Suez crisis shaped subsequent British and Allied naval strategy and deployment in the Cold War Political, local, social and economic effects of Suez on dockyards and shipyards globally Global strategic threats and opportunities arising from Suez Suez accelerated the global power shift from Britain to the United States – evidence? If your proposal is accepted, you will present in-person or online. We shall refund UK/European travel fares to the conference (other overseas: travel from UK airport to Greenwich), your fee, lunch and contribute to accommodation, publish your paper and give you a journal volume. Your talk will be c.30 minutes, the printed paper 6–10k words, due 31 June 2026. Send your title, a 300-word synopsis and a 100-word biography by 15 December 2025 or earlier to Roger Bendall [email protected] and Dr Ann Coats [email protected] N.B. The proposal should present original research. https://navaldockyards.org/conferences/ https://navaldockyards.org/ Facebook: NavalDockyardsSociety   Nutting, Anthony. No End of a Lesson. Constable, 1967. p. 108. A noted Arabist, Nutting resigned as Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs in protest at the invasion of Egypt.  

  A graduate of Queen’s University and the University of Toronto, Walter Lewis has served on the editorial board of FreshWater and is the production editor The Northern Mariner. In 1990 he took up scuba diving as part of the research for The River Palace, co-authored with Rick Neilson of Kingston and published by Dundurn in 2008.  His articles have appeared in places as varied as The Northern Mariner, FreshWater, Inland Seas,Ontario History, Beaver, Horizon Canada and the Dictionary of Canadian Biography. His website, MaritimeHistoryOfTheGreatLakes.ca is recognized as a key resource for those doing research in the history of the Great Lakes.  He is currently a member of the executive council of the Canadian Nautical Research Society and chairs the Programs, Projects & Publications committee of the Association for Great Lakes Maritime History. Among others, his current research interests include iron shipbuilding, ship repair facilities and classification societies on the Great Lakes. This post was originally posted (in a shorter form) at Stories Maritime History of the Great Lakes. Thank you very much to Walter for allowing us to post and updated version as the first entry for our ‘Academic Processes and Digital Humanities‘ series. The most important shipping business journals published in the Great Lakes region prior to the Great Depression were the Marine Record (1878 – August 1902) and the Marine Review (March 1890-October 1935). When they merged in 1902, the result was published under the somewhat awkward banner “Marine Review and Marine Record,” while keeping the volume and issue numbering of the Review. In January 1904, “Marine Record” was dropped from the title, with the Record‘s remaining legacy being the claim on the cover that the journal was “established 1878.” Five years later, in April 1909, the new owners, Penton Publishing, switched from a weekly to a monthly format, which they retained until the journal was sold and merged with Marine Engineering and Shipping Age into Marine Engineering and Shipping Review, still published, but now known as MarineLog. While Marine Engineering dates from 1897, MarineLog also chooses to celebrate its origins from the first publication of the Marine Record in 1878. Now if we could only locate some issues of the Record from before 1883. Some years ago the Center for Archival Collections at Bowling Green State University organized the microfilming of many of the early issues of both the Marine Record and the Marine Review up to end of 1902. In 2010, we added just short of 17,000 pages from that microfilm to the Maritime History of the Great Lakes website covering the years 1883-1902. Thanks to issues shared by the Dossin Museum in Detroit, along with Ron Beaupre and Greg Rudnick, I have been able to both extend the coverage of the Marine Review to its end in 1935, but also to replace all but 2500 pages of the microfilm with images from the originals. The result is just over 55,000 pages of marine journalism published in Cleveland, Ohio. The journals had deep roots in Great Lakes shipping although from World War I, there was an increasing emphasis on global developments. One question I have been asked is “why go to the time and effort to re-shoot the issues from the originals?” A couple of examples may explain why. Almost all microfilm is photographed in black and white, with an emphasis on high contrast exposures that improves the ability to read the text on standard microfilm readers. The company that digitized the BGSU microfilm emphasized this contrast in the files they produced for us. For pages from the era of woodcut engravings this is less of an concern, although the additional generation of negative/positive print before digitization can still introduce focus issues. The challenge in many films comes from shadows in gutters in instances when the paper wasn’t disbound before filming (true here). Content in those columns may come up very dark, and after digitization, black on black. In part this is because many digitization projects, especially ones done ten or more years ago, were struggling to reduce file size and assumed that bitonal (aka each pixel in the image is either black or white) images would be acceptable. In some instances they are. But with the increasing use of photographs in the 1890s, the degree of greyness at which a given point on the page was converted to either black or white, makes for some very unhappy images. The Marine Review prided itself on its illustrations. Reshooting these, not just in greyscale, but in colour restored a significant amount of detail. This was especially true, when some earlier owner of the issue marked it up with a blue or other coloured pencil. Marine Review (Cleveland, OH), 8 Mar 1900, p. 9   from microfilm from the original The conversion to bitonal files also has a significant impact on the quality of the Optical Character Recognition (OCR) of the files. This is a computer process that converts the images of the text to text that can be searched in our indexes. When, for example, letters have parts that print more faintly, or where there is bleed-through from the ink on the other side of the page, the results are far from satisfactory. Best paragraph from the Microfilm – (midpoint, left column) from reshoot of original A ILUBBY OYIB DIIY TOBTUGAB. Iuststpruentthereisalittle flurryin Wuhingtoubetween the navy department and the Marine Hospital service. navy ‘departlnent has recently yent 050.000 establishing a coding nation at Dry Tor- tuga: an In equt wha considers. u the island. the most im- rortan ‘ 1ss::erntheChesa eand Central America. A ew bp g was en rised to receive a notifiatiqn from the ta-usury department to stop war at Dr! TOTIIIEII 5! tP”‘ 1. 55 Surgeon General W needed the place to are for yellow lever and bubonic plague patients. The ma thinks that the-e are sevwal other adjacent s a avail: . ‘lfllfvgaa and will de- elinetosurrenderDry ortugasnnlesslpecl yofildtdmdoiohr lhepréktthirnlell ‘ . A FLURRY OVER DRY TORTUGAS. Just at present there is a little flurry in Washington between the navy department and the Marine Hospital service. The navy department_has recently […]

Please give a warm welcome to Noor Hashmi, who is joining site staff as our Manchester Correspondent.  Noor Hashmi is currently pursuing an MA in Early Modern History at The University of Sheffield, where her research focuses on Caribbean slavery during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, particularly in Barbados and Jamaica. She previously completed a BA (Hons) in History at the University of Sheffield, graduating in July 2024. Following her undergraduate studies, Noor was awarded a Sheffield Postgraduate Scholarship. Her BA dissertation, titled ‘A Study of Medicine and Diseases in the Middle Passage,’ offered a comparative and chronological social and cultural analysis of how British surgeons and enslaved people treated diseases in West Africa, aboard slave ships, and in the Caribbean, as well as the motivations underpinning these practices. During her postgraduate studies, Noor’s research has expanded to examine Manchester’s historical connections to slavery. She was awarded the Dorothy Phillips Prize for Historical Research for the best funding proposal to support archival work for her MA dissertation. She also held the role of MA Social Secretary within the Department of History and Archaeology’s Postgraduate Forum, where she was responsible for organising and overseeing key events such as the PGR Colloquium, while also acting as a representative for MA students, voicing their concerns and contributing to departmental discussions. For any enquiries and projects, please contact her via email ([email protected]). Noor can also be found on Bluesky and Instagram.

2 October 2025 Andrew Livsey, King’s College London Sea Power Thought in the Cold War 16 October 2025 Ben Redding, University of East Anglia 1650s and 60s, Officer Radicalism in the English navy 30 October 2025 Asif Shakoor, Independent Scholar & Georgie Wemyss, University of East London ‘Unearthing Invisible Seafaring Histories of Empire’: Title to be Confirmed 13 November 2025 Alex Clarke, Independent Naval Historian & Founding Member of ShipShape Procurement for Peace 27 November 2025 Synnøve Marie Kvam, Project S/S Wanja & M/V Mim S/S Wanja and M/V Mim: the Ships that Changed Strategies in the North Atlantic early in WWII The Proctor Memorial Lecture: to be held at Lloyds Register 11 December 2025 Guðni Th. Jóhannesson, University of Iceland “We won!” The Cod Wars and the confessions of a historian who became head of state Registration for the Proctor Lecture on the 11th of December 2025 is to be done via the BCMH website Lectures & Events : British Commission for Maritime History The King’s Maritime History Seminars for 2025-26 may be attended in person or online. As always, attendance is free and open to all. To take part, you must register by visiting the KCL School of Security Studies Events page, here: www.kcl.ac.uk/security-studies/events.   Online attendees will receive instructions shortly before the event, by email, about how to join. Otherwise, we will meet in person, as usual, in the Dockrill Room, KIN 628, at King’s College London. Papers will begin at 17:15 GMT. The King’s Maritime History Seminar is hosted by the ‘Laughton Naval Unit’ and the ‘Sir Michael Howard Centre for the History of War’ in the Department of War Studies, King’s College London. It is organised by the British Commission for Maritime History (www.maritimehistory.org.uk) in association with the Society for Nautical Research (https://snr.org.uk/). For further information contact Dr Alan James, War Studies, KCL, WC2R 2LS ([email protected]).