And how do ICE agents respond to their status being challenged again by insubordination? Correct, with more violence. 20/
And how do ICE agents respond to their status being challenged again by insubordination? Correct, with more violence. 20/
Therefore, it doesn't really take a lot of effort to incite new violence. 19/
Therefore, it doesn't really take a lot of effort to incite new violence. 19/
Nobody's talking about it, nobody's seeking any systemic solutions to it, it's only getting exploited by the elites and harms everyone else. 18/
Nobody's talking about it, nobody's seeking any systemic solutions to it, it's only getting exploited by the elites and harms everyone else. 18/
This is what conservatives love him for the most: he keeps their tiny little ass backwards world stable. 16/
This is what conservatives love him for the most: he keeps their tiny little ass backwards world stable. 16/
Suddenly, conservatives found themselves *below the "inferior"*. Their ancient monkey brain could not reconcile with that.
Still can't. 15/
Suddenly, conservatives found themselves *below the "inferior"*. Their ancient monkey brain could not reconcile with that.
Still can't. 15/
Why? Because the Democrats, inadvertently, *did* push them down the pecking order. And expected them to "grow out of it". They didn't.
14/
Why? Because the Democrats, inadvertently, *did* push them down the pecking order. And expected them to "grow out of it". They didn't.
14/
Here's the critical part: they actually weren't lying. It's just that it wasn't about actual oppression: rather, it was about _the hierarchy_. 12/
Here's the critical part: they actually weren't lying. It's just that it wasn't about actual oppression: rather, it was about _the hierarchy_. 12/
They *protect* billionaires and conservative politicians because they cannot stand *their own* status being challenged to begin with. 9/
They *protect* billionaires and conservative politicians because they cannot stand *their own* status being challenged to begin with. 9/
1. There is a dominance hierarchy in the US, where women, POC, LGBTQIA+, and also the poor are considered to be "D" and "E", whereas the wealthy and conservative (!) politicians are considered "A" and "B".
6/
1. There is a dominance hierarchy in the US, where women, POC, LGBTQIA+, and also the poor are considered to be "D" and "E", whereas the wealthy and conservative (!) politicians are considered "A" and "B".
6/
4/
4/
2/
2/
But whether it happens in the first place is a question of guardrails.
But whether it happens in the first place is a question of guardrails.