Is the rise of social mobility tied to a decline in family influence? Our findings suggest otherwise. Kinship, particularly sibling ties, continued shaping social outcomes even during industrialization.
Is the rise of social mobility tied to a decline in family influence? Our findings suggest otherwise. Kinship, particularly sibling ties, continued shaping social outcomes even during industrialization.
First-married sisters often played important roles in supporting siblings, even within rigid inheritance systems like Catalonia's single-heir system? Marrying "down" wasn’t always a disadvantage—it could also be strategic.
First-married sisters often played important roles in supporting siblings, even within rigid inheritance systems like Catalonia's single-heir system? Marrying "down" wasn’t always a disadvantage—it could also be strategic.
The influence wasn’t limited to brothers. First-married sisters also shaped their siblings' mobility, challenging ideas like women’s hypergamy.
The influence wasn’t limited to brothers. First-married sisters also shaped their siblings' mobility, challenging ideas like women’s hypergamy.
First-married brothers (FM siblings) significantly influenced the SES of their siblings. This wasn’t about replacing parental roles but about new intragenerational cooperation.
First-married brothers (FM siblings) significantly influenced the SES of their siblings. This wasn’t about replacing parental roles but about new intragenerational cooperation.
Proto-industrialization! As societies transitioned, horizontal ties (siblings) increasingly supplemented or replaced vertical ties (parents). A sign of family cooperation, not loss of family influence.
Proto-industrialization! As societies transitioned, horizontal ties (siblings) increasingly supplemented or replaced vertical ties (parents). A sign of family cooperation, not loss of family influence.
Traditionally, parents were seen as the main influence on children’s socio-economic status. But from the 18th century, siblings—especially first-married brothers—began playing a larger role. What can explain this shift?👇
Traditionally, parents were seen as the main influence on children’s socio-economic status. But from the 18th century, siblings—especially first-married brothers—began playing a larger role. What can explain this shift?👇
Research Insights:
Social mobility didn’t erase family influence; it restructured it.
Horizontal ties gained prominence, aligning with proto-industrial dynamics.
Research Insights:
Social mobility didn’t erase family influence; it restructured it.
Horizontal ties gained prominence, aligning with proto-industrial dynamics.
Our latest research deals with family influence on socio-economic outcomes in the Barcelona area (16th–19th centuries) using the Barcelona Historical Marriage Database (BHMD). We use unique data combining both occupational and economic information!
Our latest research deals with family influence on socio-economic outcomes in the Barcelona area (16th–19th centuries) using the Barcelona Historical Marriage Database (BHMD). We use unique data combining both occupational and economic information!