Gareth Jones
@garethjones1.bsky.social
An epidemiologist, for the most part.
www.abdn.ac.uk/people/gareth.jones
Previously on Twitter @hteraG_senoJ
www.abdn.ac.uk/people/gareth.jones
Previously on Twitter @hteraG_senoJ
I believe GenAI does have a role here.
But software is just a tool. Accordingly, it should be used properly, by people who understand what it does, how it does it, and aren't fooled by it just because it's easy to use.
I find it very easy to use a scalpel. But would you trust me with your surgery?
But software is just a tool. Accordingly, it should be used properly, by people who understand what it does, how it does it, and aren't fooled by it just because it's easy to use.
I find it very easy to use a scalpel. But would you trust me with your surgery?
November 14, 2025 at 11:05 AM
I believe GenAI does have a role here.
But software is just a tool. Accordingly, it should be used properly, by people who understand what it does, how it does it, and aren't fooled by it just because it's easy to use.
I find it very easy to use a scalpel. But would you trust me with your surgery?
But software is just a tool. Accordingly, it should be used properly, by people who understand what it does, how it does it, and aren't fooled by it just because it's easy to use.
I find it very easy to use a scalpel. But would you trust me with your surgery?
Every study should have some degree of End-User Involvement.
Every researcher should think - and every grant-awarding body should ask - who are the end users of this proposed research?
Every researcher should think - and every grant-awarding body should ask - who are the end users of this proposed research?
November 13, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Every study should have some degree of End-User Involvement.
Every researcher should think - and every grant-awarding body should ask - who are the end users of this proposed research?
Every researcher should think - and every grant-awarding body should ask - who are the end users of this proposed research?
On p44:
~ In the UK 200,000 adults have a probable diagnosis of #PsoriaticArthritis.
And also on p44:
~ In the UK, around 9,000 adults have a probable diagnosis of #PsoriaticArthritis.
A 22-fold difference in estimates!
Even putting aside the phrase "probable diagnosis", this is confusing.
~ In the UK 200,000 adults have a probable diagnosis of #PsoriaticArthritis.
And also on p44:
~ In the UK, around 9,000 adults have a probable diagnosis of #PsoriaticArthritis.
A 22-fold difference in estimates!
Even putting aside the phrase "probable diagnosis", this is confusing.
November 6, 2025 at 12:23 PM
On p44:
~ In the UK 200,000 adults have a probable diagnosis of #PsoriaticArthritis.
And also on p44:
~ In the UK, around 9,000 adults have a probable diagnosis of #PsoriaticArthritis.
A 22-fold difference in estimates!
Even putting aside the phrase "probable diagnosis", this is confusing.
~ In the UK 200,000 adults have a probable diagnosis of #PsoriaticArthritis.
And also on p44:
~ In the UK, around 9,000 adults have a probable diagnosis of #PsoriaticArthritis.
A 22-fold difference in estimates!
Even putting aside the phrase "probable diagnosis", this is confusing.