Gang Chen
banner
gangchen6.bsky.social
Gang Chen
@gangchen6.bsky.social
Statistical modeling, Bayesian inference, causal effect estimation, hierarchical structures; FMRI data analysis; classical music; jogging/hiking; reading; meandering
I had the privilege of seeking help from Dr. Fox intermittently between 2008 and 2015 via r-help and email regarding multivariate linear modeling and the R package 'car'. His insight, generosity, and willingness to help the community are greatly missed.
November 28, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Thanks for the great question! Text can only go so far. Hopefully the attached image does a better job than my words. The key is integrating spatial relatedness among neighboring voxels directly into the hierarchy (the green part), which is what sets it apart from the usual mass-univariate approach.
November 27, 2025 at 12:25 PM
Memory has a strange way of letting us live multiple lives at once. Thank you for sharing this. Wishing you steadiness in the present.
November 23, 2025 at 10:25 AM
Thanks! A takeaway from our earlier work is that the role of trials isn’t quite what people assume. If the goal is group-level inference, trial count still matters, but it can be traded off with subject number. It’s the combination of both that matters, not either one alone.
doi.org/10.1016/j.ne...
Hyperbolic trade-off: The importance of balancing trial and subject sample sizes in neuroimaging
Here we investigate the crucial role of trials in task-based neuroimaging from the perspectives of statistical efficiency and condition-level generali…
www.sciencedirect.com
November 21, 2025 at 3:54 AM
If your ultimate inference target is the group level, then what matters is the joint contribution of trial number per condition and participant sample size, not either one in isolation. We explored this point in detail here:
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Hyperbolic trade-off: The importance of balancing trial and subject sample sizes in neuroimaging
Here we investigate the crucial role of trials in task-based neuroimaging from the perspectives of statistical efficiency and condition-level generali…
www.sciencedirect.com
November 21, 2025 at 3:37 AM
Next up: bringing this to everyday analysis.

AFNI’s new program SIMBA is in development and aims to make full whole-brain voxel-level hierarchical modeling accessible to users, hopefully within the next few months.
November 18, 2025 at 10:13 PM
And the next step? Full voxel-level modeling.

Recent numerical advances cracked the scalability barrier. Voxel-level hierarchical modeling is now feasible, revealing just how punishing traditional multiple-comparison adjustments really are.
arxiv.org/abs/2511.12825
SIMBA: Scalable Image Modeling using a Bayesian Approach, A Consistent Framework for Including Spatial Dependencies in fMRI Studies
Bayesian spatial modeling provides a flexible framework for whole-brain fMRI analysis by explicitly incorporating spatial dependencies, overcoming the limitations of traditional massive univariate app...
arxiv.org
November 18, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Whole-brain hierarchical modeling used to feel impossible under the Bayesian framework. It’s become within reach.

@mandymejia.bsky.social’s group demonstrated computational feasibility on the cortical surface and showed major gains in inferential efficiency.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
November 18, 2025 at 10:13 PM
What if multiple comparisons weren’t an afterthought?

Hierarchical modeling at the group level bakes the adjustment into the model. Even early demos, despite brutal computational demands, already showed clear gains when applied to a set of regions.
link.springer.com/content/pdf/...
link.springer.com
November 18, 2025 at 10:13 PM
However, splitting the RSA computation into two steps may lead to information loss. A single-step approach using regression or hierarchical modeling appears to improve precision, reliability and interpretability in estimating representational similarity. arxiv.org/abs/2511.00395
Is Representational Similarity Analysis Reliable? A Comparison with Regression
Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) is a popular method for analyzing neuroimaging and behavioral data. Here we evaluate the accuracy and reliability of RSA in the context of model selection, a...
arxiv.org
November 4, 2025 at 11:11 AM
Thanks to Zhengchen Cai, @kordinglab.bsky.social, Tom Liu, Josh Faskowitz, @fmri-today.bsky.social, Bharat Biswal, and @afni-pt.bsky.social for fueling this ride and helping turn it into a commentary.
September 20, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Has resting-state fMRI leaned too much on inductive, data-driven modeling? It can reveal patterns, but also spurious results and weak explanations, the classic "tail wagging the dog." The real challenge is restoring theory-driven, deductive modeling to guide the science.
September 20, 2025 at 1:13 AM
...but leaning solely on correlation carries hazards: omnipresent noise, over-interpretation, and a canyon separating correlation from true neural mechanisms. And when correlations start masquerading as causes? Welcome to the land of chaos, confusion, and boobytraps.
September 20, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Well, whenever you take a break from being a task guy… don’t you technically become a rest guy?
July 19, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Quite interesting! Are we veering into an ontological vs epistemological distinction here? Conceptually, brain activity can be decomposed into task-independent and task-induced components, but practically, the boundary between them is often blurred and difficult to disentangle in real data.
July 19, 2025 at 4:39 PM
So does it boil down to this: trading one flavor of contamination (task engagement) for another (microsleep roulette)?
July 19, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Has neuroimaging reached the glorious era where a magical residualization spell can summon the latent resting-state signal from the ashes of task-induced disruption? I’d love to see such an incantation, especially if it comes with a modeling wand.
July 18, 2025 at 4:55 PM