Gabe Lenz
gabelenz.bsky.social
Gabe Lenz
@gabelenz.bsky.social
Professor of Political Science at UC Berkeley
Convince the other side you support democracy. They’ll be less likely to tolerate backsliding by their own side.
September 11, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Nice work. As always, Jon is a fountain of knowledge.
July 13, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Reposted by Gabe Lenz
Don’t trust an observational model with a bunch of arbitrary control variables

@gabelenz.bsky.social @alexandersahn.bsky.social Lenz, Gabriel S., and Alexander Sahn. "Achieving statistical significance with control variables and without transparency." Political Analysis

doi.org/10.1017/pan....
Achieving Statistical Significance with Control Variables and Without Transparency | Political Analysis | Cambridge Core
Achieving Statistical Significance with Control Variables and Without Transparency - Volume 29 Issue 3
doi.org
April 7, 2025 at 6:14 PM
July 11, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Even though voters didn’t learn they were out of line with Trump, it’s likely that Trump lost out on the sustained increase in support that leaders around the world received in the first year or two of COVID merely, it seems, for taking the virus seriously, if ineffectively. See: t.co/2emeZLthLp
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691213453/the-bitter-end
t.co
July 11, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Of course, this was a close election, and it’s very possible that those who did learn and defect were pivotal in Trump’s loss.
July 11, 2025 at 5:28 PM
So, will voters stand up for their policy views on Election Day? At least on this policy and for this candidate, the answer appears to be no, at least not in large numbers.
July 11, 2025 at 5:27 PM
The follow-the-leader tendency is largest for WHO membership. Among Trumpers who supported membership in Aug. 2020, and who never learned Trump’s stance on it, support remained near 100% after the election. By contrast, among those who learned Trump’s stance, support fell to 45%.
July 11, 2025 at 5:27 PM
Instead of punishing Trump, Trump supporters dramatically changed their views on these COVID policies. When they learned Trump’s policies, they followed the leader. :-)
July 11, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Did those voters defect when they learned? Since so few learned Trump’s stance, we lack the power to shed much light on this question, and it’s a hard causal one. Nevertheless, we don’t see much sign of defection among those who realized they were out of line with Trump.
July 11, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Despite billions spent on the campaign, Trumpers mostly didn’t learn that Trump was out of line with them on COVID. On mandatory masks in public, for example, the % saying Biden supported this more than Trump increased from 19% to only 40%.
July 11, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Eric Guntermann and I had a panel survey in the field. So we were able to take advantage of this apparent blunder. Did Trump voters learn they were out of step with him on this issue? Did they defect from him when they learned?
July 11, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Politicians are usually strategic. They don’t often step out of line with their voters on highly salient issues during campaigns. Theories of democracy suggest that voters should learn they are out of line and punish them, but we don’t actually know if they do. It’s a hard empirical question.
July 11, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Not only were Trump voters out of line with Trump on COVID, they also mostly didn’t realize they were out of line. Among Trump voters who wanted mandatory masks in public, only 19% thought Biden was more supportive of this policy than Trump.
July 11, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Trump’s pollsters repeatedly warned him he was out of line with his own voters. The RNC chair and some of his advisors pleaded with him to change his stance. Trump ignored them.
July 11, 2025 at 5:21 PM
In the 2020 campaign, at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, Trump took a stance out of line, not only with the public in general, but even with his own voters. It’s been forgotten, but even Trumpers were scared and wanted masks and aggressive gov’t action in 2020.
July 11, 2025 at 5:20 PM