Now I wonder, if we need to do static analysis, is there any benefit to do it in user-space

Thanks Paul. It is interesting that it is not impossible

So many super awesome talks in the Linux Plumber by the way. I thank everyone for sharing their works

I was taught python. It was a nice start. Easy to make progress and use modules to build more complex things. But I may also come up with counter argument for it. It's probably same for any lang. So maybe the prog. lang. shouldn't be the main topic & just an example of how to apply programming

I was scared when I saw the title of the post. It seems easy to misunderstand the point. But also I am super excited to see how eBPF evolves to support more applications with better performance and more flexibility

For me, this is a new angle to look at the problem. Thanks for sharing it. I wish you the best.

NINeS @nines-conference.org is the first conference specifically formulated to combat stale ideas, reviewer fatigue, and shallow program committees. By stimulating the community's collective creative pathways, NINeS will help restore energy, imagination, and genuine dialogue in networking research.

I see... I looked up gitpod after watching the video and was confused by their website

I appreciate people working on eBPF internals and writing blogs about it. It's super nice

Congratulations Gianni

I'm not sure if NLP is relevant, or not. But what I remember from python's doctest is that it checks some unittest embeded into docstring.

It would be nice if there was a test that flagged undocumented assumptions, abstraction, control flow, ...