Oliver
@fromoliver.bsky.social
Optimistic catastrophist. Procrastivist. Research comms & impact. Writes books, takes photos. https://oliverfrancis.net/
I mean you know you're not drinking booze, but you're still actually enjoying it (and it's appropriately priced - paying alcohol prices for alcohol free does annoy me)
November 30, 2025 at 8:31 AM
I mean you know you're not drinking booze, but you're still actually enjoying it (and it's appropriately priced - paying alcohol prices for alcohol free does annoy me)
This stuff is genuinely good - only one of its type I properly enjoy www.thewinesociety.com/product/grat...
Gratien and Meyer Festillant Sparkling Sans Alcool
share.google
November 30, 2025 at 8:15 AM
This stuff is genuinely good - only one of its type I properly enjoy www.thewinesociety.com/product/grat...
Reposted by Oliver
Springer-Nature statement
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
Riding the Autism Bicycle to Retraction Town
Does anyone *really* know their Factor Fexcectorn?
nobreakthroughs.substack.com
November 28, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Springer-Nature statement
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
“Whilst the details of peer review are confidential, we can confirm that the article underwent two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers, supporting an accept decision.”
How am I now expected to believe that two people looked at the paper twice and DGAF?
I bet the CMS they're having to use is really glitchy.
November 26, 2025 at 4:57 PM
I bet the CMS they're having to use is really glitchy.
Reposted by Oliver
The 80's were 20 years ago. Just like the 2000's were also 20 years ago. I don't see why this is so hard to understand.
November 25, 2025 at 4:51 AM
The 80's were 20 years ago. Just like the 2000's were also 20 years ago. I don't see why this is so hard to understand.
Don't have nightmares.
November 23, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Don't have nightmares.
Who is this even for?
November 22, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Who is this even for?