Friedemann Weber
banner
friedemann.bsky.social
Friedemann Weber
@friedemann.bsky.social
Basic researcher on viruses and innate immunity. Professor and Chair. Opinions are my own
Ah verdammt, nicht in Physik aufgepasst
November 27, 2025 at 1:29 PM
Reposted by Friedemann Weber
All das und noch viel mehr am Freitag ab 7 Uhr im Morgenmagazin der freien Radios.

Es geht auch um die Arbeit der AIDS-Hilfe Halle.

Ich spreche zudem mit @paulschuberth.bsky.social und Frédéric Valin über ihren Sammelband „Die verdrängte Pandemie. Linke Stimmen gegen den Pandemierevisionismus“.
November 26, 2025 at 9:21 AM
2/2
-benefit of the vaccine appears twofold.
First, the vaccine reduces the viral load and, consequently, less viral-induced prothrombin activation.
Second, the vaccine reduces infiltration of coagulation components into infected lungs
November 26, 2025 at 10:04 AM
Reposted by Friedemann Weber
Falls ja: Lohnt sich eventuell hier die nächsten Tage die Lauscher/Augen offenzuhalten.
November 24, 2025 at 5:37 PM
😀
November 3, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Finally, I don’t see an advantage in leaving RE sites in. When you recombine fragments to test out new variants you need to start again with the PCR fragments flanked by RE sites, whether the latter will stay in the genome or not its the same procedure
3/
November 3, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Thirdly, the RE sites Bruttel et al sell as engineering footprints are neither at gene borders nor regularly spaced (even an 800 nt fragment D in the ORF1b) - makes no sense
2/
November 3, 2025 at 1:12 PM
Firstly, I did not allow @mbweissman.bsky.social to publish my private response to him. This is a breach of confidentiality. I have reported it

Secondly, engineering RE sites into a virus genome could jeopardize functionality, so why would anyone do that with a novel, unknown genome?
1/
November 3, 2025 at 1:12 PM