Daniel 🦖=🐦‍⬛
LightNews LightNews
banner
fordcruller.bsky.social
Daniel 🦖=🐦‍⬛
@fordcruller.bsky.social
170 followers 840 following 990 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
fordcruller.bsky.social
+ 1, aber im regal
December 13, 2025 at 9:54 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
an hymnen zur zeugnisvergabe erinnere ich mich nicht - aber an den fahnenappell

vielleicht wäre das ja ein ansatz
December 13, 2025 at 7:28 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
Ja. Petry und Kemmerich
December 13, 2025 at 2:55 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
jesawyer.bsky.social Josh Sawyer @jesawyer.bsky.social · 5d
From Vincent's article, this is an odd thing to assert when robots intended for replacing human labor don't need to do many the things humans do (or evolved through doing): grow from infancy, reproduce, be a contiguous corporeal entity. You're also not building robots out of flesh, bone, and blood.
https://harpers.org/archive/2025/12/kicking-robots-james-vincent-humanoids/ Jonathan Hurst, the co-founder and chief robot officer at Agility Robotics, makes a more fundamental claim. Even if you were to start from scratch when designing a machine to handle human labor, he says, you would still end up re-creating the Homo sapiens blueprint simply as a matter of convergent evolution. Form must follow function, and if that function is to replace humans, it helps to be human-shaped. Take, for example, warehouse work, which is usually seen as the beachhead for humanoids owing to its relative simplicity and recruitment challenges. Unless you want to completely redesign your warehouse, you need to build machines that are able to navigate between tightly packed shelves while also lifting and grabbing objects, and that can maintain their balance while their center of gravity shifts from high to low. If you were taking a simple approach, you might design something resembling a coatrack on wheels, with platforms that move up and down along a central tower. But for that machine not to topple over when it lifts a heavy object to an upper shelf, it would need a large base that would make it much less maneuverable. The best solution for this work, Hurst and others argue, is a bipedal, bimanual robot that can turn on the spot and adjust its center of gravity while carrying heavy items. Even the addition of a robot “head” makes sense, as you need to put cameras and sensors somewhere high to oversee the work. As Hurst puts it: “We’re not copying a person. We’re doing it for actual reasons.”
December 13, 2025 at 12:04 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
beste Timeline usw
December 13, 2025 at 12:00 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
Alles Gute! 💖🎉
December 12, 2025 at 11:55 AM
fordcruller.bsky.social
Alles Gute euch beiden!
December 12, 2025 at 10:45 AM
fordcruller.bsky.social
3
December 11, 2025 at 2:00 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
4
December 11, 2025 at 2:00 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
3
December 11, 2025 at 1:59 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
4
December 11, 2025 at 1:59 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
4
December 11, 2025 at 1:58 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
3
December 11, 2025 at 1:58 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
3
December 11, 2025 at 1:58 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
ver stehe die frage nciht
December 11, 2025 at 1:45 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
has srede imho. kürbenquiche ist kös tlich
December 11, 2025 at 1:33 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
Mr. Scott would do it in 1 1/2 weeks
December 10, 2025 at 12:51 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
Homo erectus! Damit hat das ganze Schlammassel doch angefangen!!!
December 10, 2025 at 12:34 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
Welche Ziele genau und was davon wurde erreicht?
December 10, 2025 at 12:29 PM
fordcruller.bsky.social
Finde das kann so bleiben. Ich habe z.B. nicht an allen Abstimmungen teilgenommen und bin sicher nicht alleine damit. Daher sind die Stimmenanteile eh nicht super repräsentativ aus meiner Sicht. Mach dir die Arbeit einfach nicht - es geht doch um den Spaß.
December 10, 2025 at 10:48 AM
fordcruller.bsky.social
🤯
December 10, 2025 at 10:22 AM
fordcruller.bsky.social
köstlich und bekömmlich
December 10, 2025 at 10:21 AM