People always trying to stir up langdev controversy.

Yeah, in pure poker you’d always choose the quad over the full house, but forming the latter is still possible for other games.

I wouldn’t say it it was particularly deep (and I don’t mean this disparagingly) but it has a few really cool things happening in it. I would call it a modern take on Roald Dahl.

O V E R — D R O P
1 2 0 0 — B A U D
S K I = — B C K W
F I F O — L I F O
L I S P — R E P L

When R7RS small came out years ago I took a few weeks to use it as an implementation guide and found it was excellent for that use case. The Scheme reports have always been the gold standard in lang specification and it looks like they will continue to be into the future.

I glad that you liked it. I had a good feeling that you might. I hope that the best month is going well for you. I’m a bit behind on the festivities but am trying to catch up.

Whhhhaaaaattttt!? This sounds like Jar-Jar as a sith nonsense to me ;)

I haven’t read the article yet, but I will asap. For a brief window a goal in personal computing was IA (look at 80s ads to see it on display). The “I” part almost seems like an undesirable attribute in a customer.

Often bad schemes are the best schemes. But Schemes that seem to teem with squeamish morphemes are deemed against the academe dream.

Favorites so far?

It felt like they thought they had 10 episodes but found out they only had 8 late in the game.