Aus Genf diesen Samstag etwa 60 weitere Unterschriften

This moment demands clarity. There’s no neutral ground. The TPNW is the only treaty that treats nuclear weapons as what they are: weapons of mass destruction used by aggressors to bully and dominate. Which side is your government on?

So governments must decide: Will you keep enabling nuclear threats and forever wars? Or will you take a principled stand—against nuclear weapons, against hypocrisy, and for international law?

It bans all nuclear weapons, for all states. No exceptions. No impunity. No two-class law. The TPNW offers a credible path to verifiable disarmament and strengthens global norms against the use or threat of nuclear violence.

The complacency in the system built around the NPT has enabled this: a world where five nuclear states are given legitimacy, while others are punished for civilian nuclear programs. The better norm, however, already exists: the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW).

This is not just about Iran. It's about whether we allow nuclear-armed states to bomb their way through the world with impunity—again and again. Be it in #Iraq, #Georgia, #Ukraine, #Gaza, now #Iran and elsewhere.

Are they satisfied with a system that lets some countries keep nuclear weapons forever—creating endless incentives for others to get them too? Or is it time to admit this double standard is broken, outdated and dangerous?

It would be better for protecting Russian people.

We don’t need more deterrence.
We need disarmament. The TPNW offers a real, verifiable path forward — for everyone. If this moment proves anything, it’s that nuclear weapons don’t prevent war. They provoke it. It’s time to choose a different path. #TPNW

As long as some states cling to nuclear weapons, others will seek them. The longer this system persists, the more inevitable it becomes that these weapons will be used by design or mistake. With catastrophic humanitarian consequences for us all.

The belief that some countries can be trusted with nukes and others can’t is both unjust and unsustainable. This two-tier system fuels resentment, arms races, and instability.

Worse, the logic of deterrence invites pre-emptive strikes. It makes diplomacy harder. It rewards those who threaten mass destruction with geopolitical power.
This isn’t stability. It’s nuclear blackmail.

Deterrence is not peace.
It’s a gamble.
It justifies perpetual risk and incentivizes proliferation. The logic of "security through terror" doesn't hold.