Flora Graham
@floragraham.bsky.social
I write the Nature Briefing, a daily email for Nature (@nature.com) about all the science, which I hope you will enjoy.
Timeline cleanse from Canada :D www.instagram.com/reel/DQDIOzu...
22 Minutes on Instagram: "When the ICE agent is Canadian… 🇨🇦"
Canada's Immigration, Customs and Refugees Canada (IRCC) agents are responsible for ensuring the country's immigration policies are implemented effectively. With their expertise, they assess applicati...
www.instagram.com
November 21, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Timeline cleanse from Canada :D www.instagram.com/reel/DQDIOzu...
Happy to say that the Instagram comments now seem overwhelmingly to be critical of the post and reminding readers of NRPF and other useful facts. www.instagram.com/p/DRSFf4lDbHI/
Home Office on Instagram: "Under new proposals, only British citizens could be entitled to benefits and social housing as part of the biggest planned shake-up of the UK’s migrant settlement model in 5...
5,004 likes, 678 comments - ukhomeoffice on November 20, 2025: "Under new proposals, only British citizens could be entitled to benefits and social housing as part of the biggest planned shake-up of t...
www.instagram.com
November 21, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Happy to say that the Instagram comments now seem overwhelmingly to be critical of the post and reminding readers of NRPF and other useful facts. www.instagram.com/p/DRSFf4lDbHI/
Sorry I just wasn't sure what you meant. I agree manels are rubbish :)
October 28, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Sorry I just wasn't sure what you meant. I agree manels are rubbish :)
I appreciate that perspective. Just that women shouldn't be excluded from any aspect of scientific credit/prestige (including opportunities to review) because of systemic sexism. Whether peer review itself sucks is another, very important, question. Of course when it comes to sexism it's all linked
October 28, 2025 at 7:30 PM
I appreciate that perspective. Just that women shouldn't be excluded from any aspect of scientific credit/prestige (including opportunities to review) because of systemic sexism. Whether peer review itself sucks is another, very important, question. Of course when it comes to sexism it's all linked
Interesting point! Springer Nature data seems to agree 'across most fields, we see a higher % of women reviewers compared with women authors at submission' but interprets this as a good thing as it suggests 'editor efforts to diversify reviewer pools' are working www.nature.com/immersive/co...
October 28, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Interesting point! Springer Nature data seems to agree 'across most fields, we see a higher % of women reviewers compared with women authors at submission' but interprets this as a good thing as it suggests 'editor efforts to diversify reviewer pools' are working www.nature.com/immersive/co...
Hi Dr Williams, follow me and I'll message you a link to the specific article I'm subtweeting ;)
October 28, 2025 at 3:24 PM
Hi Dr Williams, follow me and I'll message you a link to the specific article I'm subtweeting ;)
It's not even politics I just want to spend some time in a bubble where 'ranch' is not considered an ingredient (sorry)
October 17, 2025 at 11:34 AM
It's not even politics I just want to spend some time in a bubble where 'ranch' is not considered an ingredient (sorry)