Giga Gecko 🔞
banner
fatass.gecko.monster
Giga Gecko 🔞
@fatass.gecko.monster
AD for a submassive boymom gecko. Expect macro, vore, and full tour teasing | 22 | 18+ Follows Only
Wait this idea cooks so hard actually
February 7, 2026 at 1:36 AM
Reposted by Giga Gecko 🔞
Worth it for their absolute despair as their peers are chomped and crunched and popped all around them and there's nothing they can do but weep and wait for their turn >:)
February 5, 2026 at 12:02 PM
The ideal scenario, someone desperately pushing further into you for the slightest chance at escape…

Just to hold them in at no effort. Its your time, you decide how long it lasts, or if it even ends at all~
February 3, 2026 at 4:05 AM
Nah I’m willing to put Nommz full on-blast, I can take the heat.

I think more people should be willing to call them out on Twitter bullshit.

I just dunno if I’m the best one to do it. But I have receipts of every antagonistic claim they made to send their audience after my friend at least.
January 30, 2026 at 6:53 AM
Frankly, just testimonies of how the site “acted” do help a bit. Especially the footage.

I’m fairly neutral/wary on it due to, again, the idea of letting things get too systemic, but that’s a personality trait of mine lol

Could be an “outside looks bad, inside looks good” thing? IDK.
January 29, 2026 at 10:37 PM
I’d be down to see what was going on there! Granted, I never got in myself so maybe I just had a critical look inside. I am VERY DOWN to be proven wrong! ^^

I don’t have disdain toward it, just a few red flags. But red flags can still be lowered if proven to not be indicative of much.
January 29, 2026 at 10:30 PM
Galleries are fair to paywall, images be large. But people who’d use the profile aspect would probably not swap sites for a *single* interaction at a time.

My issue was the payment didn’t make any sense for its stated use. But I could be letting unease fill in worse ideas not in practice. (2/2)
January 29, 2026 at 10:07 PM
That’s fair. I think keeping “furry” as non-structural as possible is important, hence my massive hesitation regarding the project.

The money thing was weird because it actively required the people who’d use the site the most to pay for something “free” elsewhere. They’d never use the site. (1/2)
January 29, 2026 at 10:07 PM
You genuinely were a pivotal figure in harassing my friend off the internet for a few days. I sincerely ask, outside of this situation, that you AT MINIMUM think of the impact that your words have in the fandom.
January 29, 2026 at 9:58 PM
Imagine if we trusted FA with, like, creating local events. Outclassed in new territories, and a couple people genuinely have power over how the fandom evolves due to the opportunity cost they now have.

Stay punk with it. We can have nice things, but must note when they’re metastasizing. (3/3)
January 29, 2026 at 7:05 PM
That’s not raising any alarm bells of entrenching themselves as the “virtual marketplace”?

Like its great that we have small things like this, but we really shouldn’t consolidate everything to them alone. Especially not in such vastly differing areas. (2/3)
January 29, 2026 at 7:05 PM
Why send your followers to harass a guy with a couple followers? Don’t let that Twitter mindset of dunk culture win.

I just think its odd that the company making a “vore digital marketplace” is trying to double-dip and monetize basic features of a “social media” on top of it all.
January 29, 2026 at 6:58 PM
I feel it should have been a select group as the first wave to hype it, waited for feedback, and then released publicly. Would at least have avoided the monetization issue.
January 29, 2026 at 6:34 PM