We use:
- Variance function regressions

- Siblings fixed models

- Sociogenomic data for propensity for educational attainment

We show that the effect of luck is socially stratified: it is larger for low SES students with high PGI for education

2/2

I think you are right!

This is the way we put it. With expansion subjects with less cultural capital attain BA and there is a longer queue of BA holders in the labor market. Some become overqualified. So: they have less cultural capital and less interest in transmitting it to their children.

that is correct!

Maybe they “find a way” to ensure their children finish high school and obtain a BA, but their advantage in terms of achievement (test scores) erodes.

Congratulations!

congratulations!!

702 euros to be precise...por el retraso de la agencia en contestar, imposibilidad de reservar con Ryanair, error en la reserva etc. Lo más absurdo es que la administración no pone ninguna pega a los 702 euros, pero impone buscar un hotel por 65 euros en Madrid

Key findings:

1. The parental advantage associated to children's achievement in PISA declines as parental education expands.

2. Two mechanisms drive this decline:
- parental over-qualification and
- reduced positive selection of parents who attain tertiary education, with expansion.

2/2

Ejemplo del esperpento actual: invitar a un ponente extranjero para un seminario

Un mes de correos entre organizadores, ponente, administración y agencia

Resultado:
– Vuelo Madrid–Milán: 700 €.
– Hotel: tope 65 € (con la clásica cadena de memorias para aprobar “la excepción que es regla”)