Vaxatious Litigant 💉
@exposingnv.bsky.social
Delving into pseudolaw, sovereign citizens, vexatious litigants, vaccine litigation 💉 & conspiracy theorists. Public interest lawsuits & some politics too.
Haha technically the defence didn’t win, the prosecution couldn’t prove their case
Also that guy is connected with the NSN - he recently attended their function in Ballan and marched with the group on August 31 at their March For Australia event
Also that guy is connected with the NSN - he recently attended their function in Ballan and marched with the group on August 31 at their March For Australia event
October 29, 2025 at 8:42 AM
Haha technically the defence didn’t win, the prosecution couldn’t prove their case
Also that guy is connected with the NSN - he recently attended their function in Ballan and marched with the group on August 31 at their March For Australia event
Also that guy is connected with the NSN - he recently attended their function in Ballan and marched with the group on August 31 at their March For Australia event
Queensland’s controversial puberty blocker ban overturned by supreme court www.theguardian.com/australia-ne...
Queensland’s controversial puberty blocker ban overturned by supreme court
Parent of transgender child successfully challenged decision by Crisafulli government to halt treatment for under 18s
www.theguardian.com
October 28, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Queensland’s controversial puberty blocker ban overturned by supreme court www.theguardian.com/australia-ne...
Oh perhaps. Hopefully, we get more clarity as the case is reported on over the next few days. But I still agree with you and think he’ll lose!
October 27, 2025 at 10:01 AM
Oh perhaps. Hopefully, we get more clarity as the case is reported on over the next few days. But I still agree with you and think he’ll lose!
Nah I like twitter
October 27, 2025 at 9:49 AM
Nah I like twitter
Based on the article it doesn’t sound like he’s challenging the constitutional validity of the legislation. It can still be a political statement & meet the definition of “offensive” in the Act
October 27, 2025 at 9:49 AM
Based on the article it doesn’t sound like he’s challenging the constitutional validity of the legislation. It can still be a political statement & meet the definition of “offensive” in the Act
He will lose lol
October 27, 2025 at 9:47 AM
He will lose lol