ERROR
error.reviews
ERROR
@error.reviews
ERROR is a bug bounty program for science
https://error.reviews/
PIs: @malte.the100.ci & @ruben.the100.ci
Chief Recommender: @ianhussey.mmmdata.io
Recommender: @jamiecummins.bsky.social
Reposted by ERROR
✨ ERROR (@error.reviews) is a bug-bounty program for science that seeks to estimate the prevalence and nature of errors. error.reviews
Home
ERROR is a bug bounty program for science to systematically detect and report errors in academic publications
error.reviews
July 24, 2025 at 2:52 PM
The full rationale, including the review and author response, are available on PsyArXiv: osf.io/preprints/ps.... The study materials and all new materials generated as part of the review are on OSF: osf.io/abyqs/. Original article available here: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/....
OSF | Sign in
osf.io
January 20, 2025 at 1:14 PM
We are very grateful to @erichehman.bsky.social and colleagues for their participation in this project. This serves to help improve our culture around scientific error, and is a testament to their commitment to scientific values of transparency and verification.
January 20, 2025 at 1:14 PM
A reformulated regression model that accounts for base rates more effectively finds no significant relationship between Black/White Racial Prejudice IAT scores and police killings of Black people. We recommend the authors seek a correction.
January 20, 2025 at 1:14 PM
The error review found that Hehman et al. (2018) did contain a major error that affects a core conclusion. Specifically, the use of a difference of proportions variable as the regression outcome did not effectively adjust for the Black population base rate.
January 20, 2025 at 1:14 PM