Esteban Ortiz-Ospina
eortizospina.bsky.social
Esteban Ortiz-Ospina
@eortizospina.bsky.social
Executive co-director @ourworldindata.org
This is the link to Duolingi's revenue numbers: investors.duolingo.com
This is what they wrote about AI in April: www.linkedin.com/feed/update/...
And this is the HEPI report: www.hepi.ac.uk/2025/07/31/n...
New report shows a catastrophic decline in formal language learning - HEPI
A new report from the Higher Education Policy Institute, The Languages Crisis: Arresting decline by Megan Bowler (HEPI Report 192), sponsored by Duolingo, shows a big drop in formal language learning....
www.hepi.ac.uk
August 13, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Reposted by Esteban Ortiz-Ospina
2/Cars are a useful comparison for thinking about technology adoption, because they are powerful, dangerous, and common. In just over a century, we moved from the first mass-produced car to about 1.2 billion cars on the road.
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM
Also, if this is just not a question or issue you had ever thought about, I recommend this post from @maiamindel.bsky.social

someunpleasant.substack.com/p/beta-10-is...
Beta 1.0 Is The Loneliest Number
Robots aren't your friends
someunpleasant.substack.com
July 21, 2025 at 12:10 PM
PS/ Here's the link to Autor's interview: youtu.be/MGKUTVyqJlI?...
A Threat Bigger than China | MIT Economist David Autor
YouTube video by Reid Hoffman
youtu.be
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM
17/ OK, this got very long. My point is that I think we need more coordinated approaches to rethink how we want to work with AI, especially in institutions that shape knowledge/skills. Leadership at universities should tackle this as an institutional challenge, and timing matters.
[END]
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM
16/ I do think we should worry about how AI might evolve, we must stay mindful of its current limitations, we should demand more from policymakers and AI companies. But adoption isn’t waiting. For universities in particular, the time to thoughtfully engage with AI is now.
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM
15/ I think an underlying issue is the gap in the public conversation that leaves people who could shape how AI is integrated into daily life feeling disempowered. Discourse swings between two extremes: AI is either dangerously powerful or disappointingly limited and can only make us dumber.
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM
14/ I see this in higher ed too. We're spending much more preventing/catching plagiarism, than redesigning how students practice, reflect, and build expertise with AI.
Similarly, peer-reviewed journals seem on an unsustainable path: paper writing is getting easier with AI, but paper review isn’t.
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM
13/ My children's homework looks much like mine did decades ago. Yet even my 10yo daughter, who doesn't have a phone or tablet, knows she can ask me to use ChatGPT for homework help. And her teachers, too, sometimes use ChatGPT to come up with the homework.
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM
12/ Teachers already use AI to create material; students already use it to complete assignments. But institutions rarely rethink what education *is* with AI. We should be reexamining how we teach, learn, delegate tasks, to avoid replicating old patterns with new tools.
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM
11/ We definitely need regulation, policies, guardrails, etc. But in my view there’s also a critical gap that the current user base can help fill now, in how AI is integrated into workflows and life. Education shows this clearly.
July 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM