It’s his happy place.

Or as we say where I come from - “not today, Satan.”

Ha! Right. Does he think a doctor who maxes out his malpractice insurance claims is getting his money’s worth?

Unfortunately, I think the premiums are already established.

I would add “and the letters I am writing to my state attorney general and insurance commissioner.”

Always

Sounds tasty. Thanks for sharing.

He found almost no one. Later he learned almost all of his distant relatives are in the US because the Scottish ones were killed off in WW1. It's a good bet anyone we meet with his last name is related.

My husband's ancestor emigrated to the US from Scotland at the time of the California Gold Rush. When hubby was in his 20s, he traveled around Scotland. Whenever he stopped in a new town, he checked out the local phonebook for his last name which is fairly obscure.

If Trump loses the use of IEEPA, he still has those other powers, so it seems to me American consumers will still be screwed.

Article reprinted in the AR Democrat Gazette.

Trump has used other legal authorities besides IEEP to impose tariffs. Those other legal authorities are not being challenged in court, so even if the Supremes rule against him, ~ 16% of imports will remain heavily tariffed, including industry-specific duties on steel, autos, lumber, etc.

3/

This is from a NYT’s analysis of Census Bureau trade data. The author’s mention the case is currently in front of the US Supreme Court challenging the president’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs affecting ~ 29% of all US imports.

2/

Many plants have closed down and bringing them back online would be very expensive. The drug companies see no financial incentive to do that. The Sandoz CEO said, “You sell a packet of antibiotics more cheaply than a packet of M&M’s. That’s offensive, and we lose money doing that.”

AR Dem-Gaz

5/