100% it feels misleading and a bit gimmicky to have it in this interview style. We don't need to pretend - just use quotes from her and give historical context. I'm glad it's not AI but I can't help but feel this is still influenced by the popularity of analogous AI-generated interview.

I got to the question about the fact she died in 2020 and got deeply concerned it was some GenAI BS. Still, the editorial note needs to be at the top of the page, not after an extremely lengthy article.

I'm exhausted by how many ideas I have sometimes. Ideas are never the issue (time/money/energy to grow them into something real IS)

The desperation (and fear) is so damn obvious. So much money has been bet on the already-bursting AI bubble. Don't ease up on the pressure or protesting!

Waiting for a response is so difficult. Staying up to wait for news, fuck I'm so tired of guns

There's another interview where they're very direct about saying absolutely no GenAI but I'm guessing that's a lot less salacious 🤷

And getting so mad when she was uncomfortable with that... Yikes

Omg this made my night. Also ridiculous how he's basically tantruming all over the place because an intelligent woman asked him a pretty basic, straightforward question

True - and I don't mind because Swedish holiday food is so good.

That said, you'll have to pry janssons frestelse from my cold dead hands!

Swedish holiday food has a great PR team because it's basically the same food for each holiday but Swedes will staunchly say otherwise 😂