Ya and the 46% that agree are the ones that end up exhibiting those worst behaviours.

Seems knockdown for replacing the profit motive to me.

I'm sure all the poor and most of the animals agree too.

This what more UNHINGED productivity for JUST more pointless profit gets us, very soon:

I now wish my name were Kate Marvel; hard to do a better pithy name than that, really?!

But, I'd say it stressing the 2nd syllable, not the first!

Kate Marveeeeeeeeellllllllle, not Kate Maaaaaaaaaarrrrvel!

All good scientists remain sceptics, about their own beliefs most of all.

These are just really, really stupid people who're wrong, will suffer, & cause the rest of us to suffer from this affliction of IGNORING OBVIOUS TRUTHS.

'Anti-vaccine dumbasses & soon to be dead fools', works.

Bit wordy?

You've been dominated into on-demand cat furniture, you are not alone, there is help, reach out, get one of these to shake up the cat's expectation of total human compliance!

We need thinking towards new value MEANS and inverted sorts of countervailed "anti-ends". My email tagline, now some 18 yrs old, might be a good example!

"The goal of every institution striving to help people should always be to obviate the need for its own existence" eM, the unknown philosopher

You can't, so at some point our default ways of making, largely only reactive systems to mostly control the admin of, not the essenece of outcomes, is itself doomed to fail in such a Yin Yang, a quantum entangled world.

We've had this answer longer, we just don't like it, i.e. to give up control.

Scope's unavoidably blind to induced effects, which aren't logical, just emergent & totally unpredictable.

As a philosopher, I've spent many brain cycles on thinking how we can plan for the future by doing something to deal w induced effects from the get go.

How do you represent negativities? 1/2

Betting persistently against a Dutch book could be deemed a form of self-destructive madness.

Here the law of large numbers says, 'expect your loses to mount w scant relent, & your wins as statistical bait & switches only justifed by the gambler's fallacy'.

An 'ends become the means' problem!

He's:

1. not aware of much that is actually real, so barely of his surroundings, and what is on TV.
2. is demented and collapsing into total unfiltered narcisism.
3. not fit to be born, let alone to have the power he was handed, he is UNFIT for existing at all, as he uglies everything he touches.

Had a glutton of a male orange tabby. He would walk on our hair at 6:30 in the morning to get us to feed him.

I would put my hand behind his butt and shoot him off the bed.

Then I would put a pillow over my head and go back to sleep.

My wife at the time, was a sucker, and would bend!

SAY NO ; )!

The constant re-electing of any Fords, past or present shows me the real problem is not leadership, but the blind voting fools who seem incapable of understanding they (he) will always be stuck in some 1950's WASPy "pave over all of Ontario" Car Culture, Leave it to Beaver view of reality.