I think this depends on where on the academic hierarchy you zoom in on. The higher you go the more male-dominated it might be.

'somewhat' is my personal favourite

There might be important differences depending on the field.

This was my initial thought also. I guess the question is what you're doing the other part-time, maybe if the match is good it can work well.

I could imagine a model where editors are paid (more) and have capacity to search through new preprints to approach authors if they'd like to go through review process with the journal. Basically a system where both sides look for each other.

So true

Questions of clinical utility of imaging markers over fluid biomarkers in dementia.

It will depend on the editor, my expectation would be that if you can prove significant contribution they wouldn't publish the paper without you.

All the best in your attempts to resolve this with the senior author, they should give you authorship if your contribution is a significant one. If things don't work out that way and you wanted to escalate it, then I would recommend contacting the editor where it's been submitted/published.

If you want your CV to be readable by some AI you shouldn't use a hidden table as a formatting aid. If not hidden tables are a great formatting aid

My talks often show up as cycling, I always thought it must be linked to my nerves also 😅

definitely bragging ;)

#neuroskyence

Yeah, you brought some good examples of that. I think films are an equally valuable tool to experimentally manipulate brain function, it all depends on which process you want to probe. In principle a film design can be modelled like a task in analysis.

Reduce screen use to the absolute minimum, see a doctor if symptoms don't improve.

Exciting work! I'm running a pilot study showing films in the fMRI to MCI patients. Film might be easier to employ in clinical research settings than task.