Agree — but having access to the OOO message may help make this decision, right? Some say "I am rather busy and may respond a day later", others say "I am offine until next month due to a family emergency", etc.

Why not give the handling editor this information? It's free.

Many of us get multiple requests a week, and commonly multiple per day. If I'm on vacation, I just don't spend time every day 1) checking my emails and 2) rejecting several requests per week. This means potentially 2+ weeks slowing down the process — which must add up tremendously.

Congrats Joel!

Also looked at the depression anxiety example, I think it's mathematically necessary you get that behavior: if cor(x1,x2)=0.7, and you remove x1 and x2 from each other and correlate what is left, you get negative cor.

Brief sim (varying original correlation, n=500 each, 100 runs each).

Thanks, agree that x1 is no longer x1 when you partial out x2, also agree that we often pretend it still is in our language (we don't use a new name for the construct after partialing out others).

Yeah same, I just can't do it. Only made a LI account this year to promote some education cut protest stuff but never log in

Excellent, thanks

2/2
.. a model; unclear why estimating partials is considered a 'questionable measurement practice). May well become clearer after reading the whole thing. Thanks!

1/2
Thanks for sharing Josh. Is there a full text somewhere accessible? I don't have access to this. Cited the original perils of partialing a bunch and can't quite make sense of this based on the abstract (people having bad mental simulations doesn't appear a sensible metric to evaluate ..

Awesome. Been here since the start and have engaged quite a bit, and never ever heard of the for you feed before. Added it now, thanks.

Oh God please don't, I talk about politics all the time and it's a hugely important topic. I just don't want to engage with it on bluesky given how much I engage with it elsewhere. That's not on people sharing content — I just wonder how to navigate building a proper timeline here :)

I follow US politics v actively, but it's not really my intended use for bluesky

Is that the way it works here? I thought blueksy doesn't really do this twitter-like post weighing etc (bc privacy, creates a personal profile of your tastes) and just shows things in sequence of what has been published.

But happy to try "managing" timeline if that helps.

Thank you so so much, everybody :)

<3

The section in the pdf is not called "Funding Information", but "Author and article information."

Marcel found it — it is not where it is in the pdf (between the end of the paper and the beginning of the bibliography), but hidden in a separate view under "author information" which opens some new window called "Funding Information" that is not searchable from the main window.

When you ctrl-cmd f for "conflicts" or anything related to this, it does not show. I don't understand this is not part of the main text between "conclusions" and "references" in the same way it is for the PDF (pink arrow html view), but hidden where you expect author affiliations, not COI.

Eicca found it hilarious my name is spelled with k rather than double cc ...