Edinburgh Bus Users Group
banner
edinburghbug.bsky.social
Edinburgh Bus Users Group
@edinburghbug.bsky.social
Looking out for Edinburgh's bus passengers and services. Independent of operators, Councils, Government, political parties etc.

Website https://edinburghbususers.group/
OK...as long as architects and planners aren't allowed anywhere near the transport stuff.
web-cdn.bsky.app/profile/edin...
November 28, 2025 at 12:02 PM
Unfortunately, reflecting on a recent Holyrood debate, our political classes seem to have little insight into achieving it.

(see forthcoming item on Transform Scotland website)
November 28, 2025 at 11:00 AM
November 26, 2025 at 5:26 PM
November 26, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Of course, if every car journey overnight became a public transport journey overnight neither train, tram nor bus couldn't cope. But it won't happen.

And of course good transport planning is driven by capacity; before politics gets in the way.

As @nigelbagshaw.bsky.social frequently points out.
November 26, 2025 at 2:46 PM
vehicle requirements from faster journey time (we hope).
Then does 'need around 300 more buses to meet peak times' means vehicles, or vehicle+driver?
Then does this assume current bus occupancy?

And bear in mind the critical variable is probably driver availability.
And 'peak hours' have changed.
November 26, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Lothian has a fleet of over 700 buses running more than 70 services through 24 hours www.lothianbuses.com/about-us/
But that seems to include Lothian Country and East Coast buses, and (perhaps) coaches.
Factor in required downtime.
Factor in greater flexibility with a bigger fleet.
Factor in reduced
November 26, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Oh, is there a Budget on?
bsky.app/profile/edin...
November 26, 2025 at 12:13 PM
Paywalled. Just when he's getting into his stride...
November 26, 2025 at 12:10 PM
That type of bollard is a hazard to pedestrians though.
November 25, 2025 at 11:09 AM
@lothianbuses.bsky.social provides nearly 120m trips/yr, more than the entire Scotrail network.

(We like trains, we really do, but time/coverage they get compared to buses...)
November 25, 2025 at 10:54 AM
complexity & cost of doing bus lanes...it took c1.5 years to cut bus lane hours in 2015; it's taken 6 years to reinstate 7-7-7 bus lanes on one corridor since @chasbooth.bsky.social motion was passed.
(assuming the trial happens this financial year ['quietly confident'])
👇
November 25, 2025 at 10:54 AM
TBF the current Council (2022-2027) is more pro-bus than it was from 2012-2022.
But funding for bus lanes has dried up in recent years; it's the first thing ScotGov cuts in difficult times. See £500m Bus Partnership Fund replaced by £20m (so far) Bus Infrastructure Fund.
That, and the growing
👇
November 25, 2025 at 10:54 AM
Surely not. Historic Environment Scotland wouldn't allow members of the public anywhere near.
November 24, 2025 at 2:40 PM
Shocked that your contributor didn't review the bollards.

Oh, wait.
November 24, 2025 at 11:12 AM
TBF, the City Region Deal was a bit like that.

(But we don't know if it was Westminster/ScotGov/both that decided Edinburgh was getting the Sheriffhall flyover whether it wanted it or not)
November 24, 2025 at 11:01 AM
OK; we look forward to your forthcoming exclusive on 'the daftest response to the tram consultation and its author's murky backstory'.
November 24, 2025 at 9:13 AM
Which of these is the best fit?
November 24, 2025 at 9:09 AM
Wait till you see a forthcoming TS commentary on a Holyrood debate! (If it's published)
November 23, 2025 at 6:01 PM
(don't want to make @nigelbagshaw.bsky.social miss the fun)
November 23, 2025 at 5:54 PM