Eastsplaining
@eastsplaining.bsky.social
Sorry, forgot "incoherent". The updated version: "This word is meanigless!" "Actually, it has a clear definition, here it goes" "Shit! Fuck! You are having meltown! While being hysterical! Incoherent! Fuck! Shit!"
November 30, 2025 at 8:54 PM
Sorry, forgot "incoherent". The updated version: "This word is meanigless!" "Actually, it has a clear definition, here it goes" "Shit! Fuck! You are having meltown! While being hysterical! Incoherent! Fuck! Shit!"
I never said " Russia answer the ussr are the same government." (whatever that means). I said many tankies supported Russia after the USSR dissolution (some do support Russia until this very day).
November 30, 2025 at 8:53 PM
I never said " Russia answer the ussr are the same government." (whatever that means). I said many tankies supported Russia after the USSR dissolution (some do support Russia until this very day).
Yep, very much so, that's how this conversation went. "This word is meanigless!" "Actually, it has a clear definition, here it goes" "Shit! Fuck! You are having meltown! While being hysterical! Fuck! Shit!"
November 30, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Yep, very much so, that's how this conversation went. "This word is meanigless!" "Actually, it has a clear definition, here it goes" "Shit! Fuck! You are having meltown! While being hysterical! Fuck! Shit!"
The reality is that Western leftwingers supporting Russia do exist. Some of them are old enough to have record of supporting USSR when it used to exist. if you deny their existence, you are denying reality.
November 30, 2025 at 8:47 PM
The reality is that Western leftwingers supporting Russia do exist. Some of them are old enough to have record of supporting USSR when it used to exist. if you deny their existence, you are denying reality.
And yet many tankies supporting USSR in 1990 turned into tankies supporting Russia in 1992. Some of them are old enough to support Russia currently (and USSR at the time).
November 30, 2025 at 8:46 PM
And yet many tankies supporting USSR in 1990 turned into tankies supporting Russia in 1992. Some of them are old enough to support Russia currently (and USSR at the time).
Looks like he tried to use Russian razor "Elektrobritva". I can relate. But wait till he tries to drive Lada.
November 30, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Looks like he tried to use Russian razor "Elektrobritva". I can relate. But wait till he tries to drive Lada.
Totally imaginary, no western leftwinger is supporting Russia (and also, of course, none ever supported USSR when it existed).
November 30, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Totally imaginary, no western leftwinger is supporting Russia (and also, of course, none ever supported USSR when it existed).
Many tankies simply switched their support of USSR in 1991 into support of Russia. I agree it was stupid on their side, because of course Russia is a right wing capitalist state, but it's not me defending them.
November 30, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Many tankies simply switched their support of USSR in 1991 into support of Russia. I agree it was stupid on their side, because of course Russia is a right wing capitalist state, but it's not me defending them.
Stopping him from what exactly, from yelling at Zelensky "you must sign it"? Yeah, he can probably do that.
November 30, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Stopping him from what exactly, from yelling at Zelensky "you must sign it"? Yeah, he can probably do that.
It's not that simple to force Ukraine to do anything. Trump already tried a number of times (and Putin many more times before him).
November 30, 2025 at 3:26 PM
It's not that simple to force Ukraine to do anything. Trump already tried a number of times (and Putin many more times before him).
I disagree. The whole "NATO expansion" was simply the will of the people in Poland, Lithuania or Finland to join NATO (and not to be Russian subjects anymore). Are we allowed to have such will or do you think it is verboten for us because we have the misfortune of living too close to Russia?
November 30, 2025 at 3:23 PM
I disagree. The whole "NATO expansion" was simply the will of the people in Poland, Lithuania or Finland to join NATO (and not to be Russian subjects anymore). Are we allowed to have such will or do you think it is verboten for us because we have the misfortune of living too close to Russia?
What if the people from the former Russian empire don't want to be recolonized by Russian empire? Do we have this right or we all belong to Putin?
November 30, 2025 at 11:57 AM
What if the people from the former Russian empire don't want to be recolonized by Russian empire? Do we have this right or we all belong to Putin?
Whoops! I said "The classic 1956 definition is "a western leftwinger who supports Soviet Union (later: Russia) no matter what", I sometimes make a shorter version because smart people are able to scroll back for the full one.
November 30, 2025 at 9:46 AM
Whoops! I said "The classic 1956 definition is "a western leftwinger who supports Soviet Union (later: Russia) no matter what", I sometimes make a shorter version because smart people are able to scroll back for the full one.
But that remaining 90% will be dirty bombs, hurting Russia in the first place. They wouldn't take this kind of risk, not for sake of Donbas.
November 30, 2025 at 9:45 AM
But that remaining 90% will be dirty bombs, hurting Russia in the first place. They wouldn't take this kind of risk, not for sake of Donbas.
Of course. Western leftwingers supporting Russia do not exist. Not even a single one. All tankies collectively dissolved on New Years Eve, when 1956 ended. Well, there was that one guy in Birmingham, he didn't get the memo so he quit only in July 1957.
November 29, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Of course. Western leftwingers supporting Russia do not exist. Not even a single one. All tankies collectively dissolved on New Years Eve, when 1956 ended. Well, there was that one guy in Birmingham, he didn't get the memo so he quit only in July 1957.
Since you are unable to scroll back, let me copypaste to you what I wrote: "The classic 1956 definition is "a western leftwinger who supports Soviet Union (later: Russia) no matter what"."
November 29, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Since you are unable to scroll back, let me copypaste to you what I wrote: "The classic 1956 definition is "a western leftwinger who supports Soviet Union (later: Russia) no matter what"."
I exaggerated saying they're not testing "anything", but their industry is generally in a bad shape (including military). The risk of "explosion at launch" is too high for them to actually try to use the remaining ICBMs they still have (on paper).
November 29, 2025 at 9:44 AM
I exaggerated saying they're not testing "anything", but their industry is generally in a bad shape (including military). The risk of "explosion at launch" is too high for them to actually try to use the remaining ICBMs they still have (on paper).
I totally made up the whole 1956. It never happened, by common agreement they just moved to 1957 on new years eve in 1955.
November 28, 2025 at 9:38 PM
I totally made up the whole 1956. It never happened, by common agreement they just moved to 1957 on new years eve in 1955.
Obviously, if you don't insult other people, you're dehumanizing them. This is so fascist, not to swear.
November 28, 2025 at 9:37 PM
Obviously, if you don't insult other people, you're dehumanizing them. This is so fascist, not to swear.
Please do. You are absolutely right, Western leftwingers supporting Russia never existed in the first place.
November 28, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Please do. You are absolutely right, Western leftwingers supporting Russia never existed in the first place.
Something tells me to tell you the definition of "sarcasm", but of course it does not exist either so I won't.
November 28, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Something tells me to tell you the definition of "sarcasm", but of course it does not exist either so I won't.
Is knowledge of definitions an "investment"? Really?
November 28, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Is knowledge of definitions an "investment"? Really?
I am totally absolutely upset about my providing coherent logical definitions. Such a bad habit! I should just replace it with profanities. I'll sign up for swearing workshop next week.
November 28, 2025 at 9:22 PM
I am totally absolutely upset about my providing coherent logical definitions. Such a bad habit! I should just replace it with profanities. I'll sign up for swearing workshop next week.
But you already got me. I admit, Western leftwing intellectuals supporting Russia (and previously, USSR) don't exist. Can I at least have that they existed in 1956 or not even that? Anyway, of course none exist today. I mean, nobody can think of ever a single name if I don't name it, right?
November 28, 2025 at 9:21 PM
But you already got me. I admit, Western leftwing intellectuals supporting Russia (and previously, USSR) don't exist. Can I at least have that they existed in 1956 or not even that? Anyway, of course none exist today. I mean, nobody can think of ever a single name if I don't name it, right?