David 🇨🇦
@drod425.bsky.social
Cruz and Paul in 2016 through the end of term 1
November 15, 2025 at 4:09 AM
Cruz and Paul in 2016 through the end of term 1
By far the best conference in the country this year
November 15, 2025 at 3:57 AM
By far the best conference in the country this year
We'll allow her to get a plot in an adjacent campground to set up her own tent
November 15, 2025 at 2:11 AM
We'll allow her to get a plot in an adjacent campground to set up her own tent
Signed the discharge petition?
November 15, 2025 at 1:59 AM
Signed the discharge petition?
I also want to know what is meant by an scare quote "favorite rock" off the side of the highway
November 14, 2025 at 6:06 PM
I also want to know what is meant by an scare quote "favorite rock" off the side of the highway
ChatGPT probably just really likes the name tbh.
November 13, 2025 at 11:23 PM
ChatGPT probably just really likes the name tbh.
November 13, 2025 at 5:16 AM
500 years from now scholars will be arguing over who this refers to, and whether it's 1 person or 3
November 13, 2025 at 4:57 AM
500 years from now scholars will be arguing over who this refers to, and whether it's 1 person or 3
"pres king pm" is art
November 13, 2025 at 4:56 AM
"pres king pm" is art
November 13, 2025 at 4:45 AM
His substack, medium, and twitter accounts all went dark in March, 2023. His linkedin says he's freelance from 2019-current, but has no recent activity.
November 13, 2025 at 4:24 AM
His substack, medium, and twitter accounts all went dark in March, 2023. His linkedin says he's freelance from 2019-current, but has no recent activity.
Their reporters were tipping him off from their work emails when other journalists were investigating around!
bsky.app/profile/chri...
bsky.app/profile/chri...
Fall 2017: Then-NYT reporter literally warning Epstein that someone is "digging around again."
![From:
Thomas Jr., Landon
Sent:
9/27/2017 2:47:47 PM
To:
Subject:
Got another call from Connelly..
Importance:
High
Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]
He is digging around again -- not clear if its another book/or expanded paperback version. Was asking me all sorts of questions about why you hired Ken Starr. I told him I had no idea - I think he is doing some Trump-related digging too.
Anyway, for what its worth...
Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_ir thomas/index.h
tml](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:36eqtmzysqf7wsslczw4uxcd/bafkreia6463yzmb2suqn5rbfslvtta667av3ryynaetbsl7x6tniezyawu@jpeg)
November 13, 2025 at 4:21 AM
Their reporters were tipping him off from their work emails when other journalists were investigating around!
bsky.app/profile/chri...
bsky.app/profile/chri...
Thomas Massie to CNN on the Epstein files: "This vote is gonna be on your record for longer than Trump is gonna be president. And what are you gonna do in 2028 and 2030 when you're in a debate … and they say, 'How can we trust you? You covered up for a pedophile back in 2025.'"
November 13, 2025 at 4:05 AM
November 12, 2025 at 9:10 PM
Warner still has no primary opponent despite being the best establishment target of the cycle. Who are they supposed to be afraid of?
November 10, 2025 at 7:37 AM
Warner still has no primary opponent despite being the best establishment target of the cycle. Who are they supposed to be afraid of?
I think it's clear that despite the US not being a parliamentary system, the founders would have thought that congress denying supply to an overreaching executive would be acceptable, if not laudatory.
This is Charles I checks & balances that they understood clearly.
This is Charles I checks & balances that they understood clearly.
November 10, 2025 at 6:26 AM
I think it's clear that despite the US not being a parliamentary system, the founders would have thought that congress denying supply to an overreaching executive would be acceptable, if not laudatory.
This is Charles I checks & balances that they understood clearly.
This is Charles I checks & balances that they understood clearly.
If you cast the deciding vote against your own leadership, and the majority of your caucus on a major bill, then you simply cannot be the whip.
The entire job is stopping that 60th vote defecting. And if Schumer isn't trying to replace him, he's endorsing the defection.
The entire job is stopping that 60th vote defecting. And if Schumer isn't trying to replace him, he's endorsing the defection.
November 10, 2025 at 5:21 AM
If you cast the deciding vote against your own leadership, and the majority of your caucus on a major bill, then you simply cannot be the whip.
The entire job is stopping that 60th vote defecting. And if Schumer isn't trying to replace him, he's endorsing the defection.
The entire job is stopping that 60th vote defecting. And if Schumer isn't trying to replace him, he's endorsing the defection.
Either he couldn't keep Durbin (his own whip) onside, or he gave Durbin permission to vote yes. Either one means the end of the current leadership.
November 10, 2025 at 5:05 AM
Either he couldn't keep Durbin (his own whip) onside, or he gave Durbin permission to vote yes. Either one means the end of the current leadership.
Does Warner even have a primary challenger?
November 10, 2025 at 4:34 AM
Does Warner even have a primary challenger?