DrCrlsnPE
banner
drcrlsnpe.bsky.social
DrCrlsnPE
@drcrlsnpe.bsky.social
😷💉⁹💪🏽🖖🏽

⚡=🔋🌬️☀️🌋🌊⚛️NucE/MechE/Law/Physics🎓Engineering/ThermalHydraulics/CFD/OpenFOAM/Woodworking🪵🪚ProfessionalEngineer(ret)🍍🌴🌺🤙🏼AttorneyAtLaw(ret)⚖️#Justice4All (🇰🇷🤝🇰🇵)🇫🇮🇺🇸#DescendantOfImmigrants👨🏾‍💻#FOSS🧏🏾‍♂️#DDBDDHH☮️#Ceasefire💪🏾#Resist🇺🇦🇨🇦🇲🇽🇪🇺#TACO🌮
"Thousands of years." 🧵

"[I]n order to obtain significant reductions in total inventories of Am or other TRU, adv nuclear fuel cycles would have to be maintained for a very long period time – on the order of several hundred years."

—EPRI. Adv Nuclear Fuel Cycles… 2010.
October 25, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Nuclear doesn't have a perception problem. Nuclear has a performance problem.
October 20, 2025 at 8:02 PM
October 19, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Same energy.
October 17, 2025 at 8:54 PM
"Several hundred years." #NuclearsDirtyLittleSecret

"[I]n order to obtain significant reductions in total inventories of Am or other TRU, adv nuclear fuel cycles would have to be maintained for a very long period time – on the order of several hundred years."

—EPRI. Adv Nuclear Fuel Cycles… 2010.
October 17, 2025 at 3:53 AM
'For a Th-closed cycle the entire reactor fleet would need to be self-sufficient in fissile generation and operating on full actinide recycle. This appears quite remote and certainly very speculative. Even if pursued, it would require several decades, if not centuries, to unfold.'
October 17, 2025 at 3:49 AM
"Thorium can't be weaponized."

Thorium-²³³U is the Keyser Söze of nuclear fuel cycles.
October 17, 2025 at 3:40 AM
"Thorium salt reactor… doesn't provide anything weapons grade."

Fact check: FalseAF #ProliferationNightmare

"U-233 has been shown to be highly satisfactory as a weapons material….

"[I]f today's weapons were based upon U-233, LRL would have no interest in switching to plutonium."
October 17, 2025 at 3:31 AM
Recycling nuclear fuel is slow. Very, very slow.

"[I]n order to obtain significant reductions in total inventories of Am or other TRU, adv nuclear fuel cycles would have to be maintained for a very long period of time – on the order of several hundred years."

—EPRI. Adv Nuclear Fuel Cycles… 2010.
October 13, 2025 at 10:58 PM
October 13, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Different time. Different tech. Different alternatives.

Even France can't repeat France.
October 13, 2025 at 6:51 PM
#ProliferationNightmare

"U-233 has been shown to be highly satisfactory as a weapons material."

"If today's weapons were based upon U-233, LRL [Lawrence Radiation Laboratory] would have no interest in switching to plutonium."

#Thorium 🧵
October 11, 2025 at 3:14 PM
The other 5%.

#ClimateEmergency
October 11, 2025 at 12:18 AM
The other 5%.

#ClimateEmergency
October 10, 2025 at 6:17 PM
"To facilitate the Defendants’ identification of Journalists protected under this Order, the following are examples of indicia of being a Journalist: visual identification as a member of the press, such as by carrying a professional press pass, badge or credentials; wearing distinctive clothing or…"
October 9, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Nuclear once aspired to power cities. Now…

#RanOutOfRealIntelligence
October 8, 2025 at 4:29 PM
Radiophobia is not even in the Top10 of nuclear's problems.🧵

Westinghouse "design is often not constructible" (Bechtel Audit, p61).

#NuclearIsItsOwnWorstEnemy
October 6, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Blaming nuclear's overruns and delays on the NRC is like blaming a drunk driver's car wreck on the DMV.

#NuclearIsItsOwnWorstEnemy
October 4, 2025 at 2:59 AM
#ProliferationNightmare

"U-233 has been shown to be highly satisfactory as a weapons material."

"If today's weapons were based upon U-233, LRL [Lawrence Radiation Laboratory] would have no interest in switching to plutonium."

#Thorium 🧵
October 3, 2025 at 11:12 PM
History has a survivor bias.
October 3, 2025 at 3:14 PM
"Several hundred years." #NuclearsDirtyLittleSecret

"[I]n order to obtain significant reductions in total inventories of Am or other TRU, adv nuclear fuel cycles would have to be maintained for a very long period time – on the order of several hundred years."

—EPRI. Adv Nuclear Fuel Cycles… 2010.
October 2, 2025 at 9:21 PM
October 2, 2025 at 3:55 PM
"They've done ok"?

🧵 The national Democratic party has abandoned us.
September 30, 2025 at 12:50 AM
"You can't make bombs from thorium."

Fact check: FalseAF

"U-233 has been shown to be highly satisfactory as a weapons material."

"If today's weapons were based upon U-233, LRL [Lawrence Radiation Laboratory] would have no interest in switching to plutonium."

#Thorium 🧵
September 29, 2025 at 7:38 PM
Justice Anthony Kennedy.
September 28, 2025 at 3:01 AM