Dominik Roth
@dominikroth.bsky.social
an anonymous, blunt instrument wielded by a government department
https://linktr.ee/dominikroth
https://linktr.ee/dominikroth
or is this a quid pro quo? i.e. it benefits journal B, and they will do something similar in reverse?
November 25, 2025 at 12:54 PM
or is this a quid pro quo? i.e. it benefits journal B, and they will do something similar in reverse?
it's not cobbled together, but it's covered by blankets (on the top part): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_S...
Space Shuttle thermal protection system - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
November 22, 2025 at 4:48 PM
it's not cobbled together, but it's covered by blankets (on the top part): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_S...
Haha, das war jetzt aber ein harter Turn.
November 22, 2025 at 1:52 PM
Haha, das war jetzt aber ein harter Turn.
kaisermühlenblues ist bei dir auch ein bisschen die nostalgie nach einer zeit, die du nicht mehr erlebt hast, oder? quasi die sisi-filme deiner generation 😛
November 22, 2025 at 1:06 PM
kaisermühlenblues ist bei dir auch ein bisschen die nostalgie nach einer zeit, die du nicht mehr erlebt hast, oder? quasi die sisi-filme deiner generation 😛
seit vielen jahren: schiebel.net
www.schiebel.net
Founded in 1951, the Schiebel Group of companies focuses on the development, testing and production of state-of-the-art mine detection equipment and the revolutionary CAMCOPTER® S-100 Unmanned Air Sys...
schiebel.net
November 22, 2025 at 1:01 PM
seit vielen jahren: schiebel.net
That's not one of the recruits.
November 17, 2025 at 11:53 AM
That's not one of the recruits.
Ja, wird im oben geposteten Erkenntnis auch zitiert. Gibt eigenes Gesetz dazu, mit geringfügig anderen Regeln.
November 13, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Ja, wird im oben geposteten Erkenntnis auch zitiert. Gibt eigenes Gesetz dazu, mit geringfügig anderen Regeln.
und wieder was gelernt: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_...
Viktor Wolf von Glanvell – Wikipedia
de.wikipedia.org
November 11, 2025 at 10:42 AM
und wieder was gelernt: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_...
This is the Cochrane DTA review on airway physical examination tests, that has been cited in the guidelines, and which I also presented in Edinburgh. #EMsky www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
www.cochranelibrary.com
November 9, 2025 at 11:52 AM
This is the Cochrane DTA review on airway physical examination tests, that has been cited in the guidelines, and which I also presented in Edinburgh. #EMsky www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
I still have the quaich and tie I got back then in Edinburgh, and I regularly wear the tie.
November 9, 2025 at 11:52 AM
I still have the quaich and tie I got back then in Edinburgh, and I regularly wear the tie.
Habe gelesen "auf dem Bodensee haben seit dreißig Jahren keine nautischen Konflikte mehr stattgefunden", und es hätte mich nicht gewundert.
November 8, 2025 at 12:02 PM
Habe gelesen "auf dem Bodensee haben seit dreißig Jahren keine nautischen Konflikte mehr stattgefunden", und es hätte mich nicht gewundert.
die verlagerungen bei gyn/gebh bedeuten eine vollständige schließung der abteilungen, oder nur des geburtshilflichen bereichs, oder...?
November 6, 2025 at 11:00 AM
die verlagerungen bei gyn/gebh bedeuten eine vollständige schließung der abteilungen, oder nur des geburtshilflichen bereichs, oder...?
I reject this gross misrepresentation of what I said in the strongest possible terms.
November 2, 2025 at 3:48 PM
I reject this gross misrepresentation of what I said in the strongest possible terms.
I am pretty sure most methodologists on systematic reviews would disagree that it mainly consists of "downloading data and putting it through a template". It explains, however, your view on systematic reviews.
November 2, 2025 at 3:42 PM
I am pretty sure most methodologists on systematic reviews would disagree that it mainly consists of "downloading data and putting it through a template". It explains, however, your view on systematic reviews.
I can't follow this logic. Why is, in your opinion, the same not true for primary research? I'd argue that you have to follow rigorous methodology and be able to prove it.
November 2, 2025 at 3:11 PM
I can't follow this logic. Why is, in your opinion, the same not true for primary research? I'd argue that you have to follow rigorous methodology and be able to prove it.
I do agree however that the cited sentence is incorrect. the target population of the research question almost never is identical with the study population. (except maybe epidemiological research and similar)
November 2, 2025 at 2:17 PM
I do agree however that the cited sentence is incorrect. the target population of the research question almost never is identical with the study population. (except maybe epidemiological research and similar)
my approach is that the inclusion criteria should be wide, and the exclusion criteria should be the exceptions to the former. but maybe there are other views on that? /4.
November 2, 2025 at 2:16 PM
my approach is that the inclusion criteria should be wide, and the exclusion criteria should be the exceptions to the former. but maybe there are other views on that? /4.