Writer, occultist, game designer, Dalek enthusiast.
https://argentgames.wordpress.com
Yep, I called it. Anything that proves you wrong suddenly “isn’t valid”.
You asked for the science, you got it. You asked for scientists, you got them.
Your constantly shifting standards of proof shows the bad faith of your arguments.
Yep, I called it. Anything that proves you wrong suddenly “isn’t valid”.
You asked for the science, you got it. You asked for scientists, you got them.
Your constantly shifting standards of proof shows the bad faith of your arguments.
But Scientific American isn’t a reliable source? 😂
Consistency isn’t your strong suit, is it?
But Scientific American isn’t a reliable source? 😂
Consistency isn’t your strong suit, is it?
John Achermann (UCL Institute of Child Health),
Arthur Arnold (University of California),
Eric Vilain (University of California Center for Gender-Based Biology),
Vincent Harley (MIMR-PHI Institute for Medical Research).
You’re welcome 😂
John Achermann (UCL Institute of Child Health),
Arthur Arnold (University of California),
Eric Vilain (University of California Center for Gender-Based Biology),
Vincent Harley (MIMR-PHI Institute for Medical Research).
You’re welcome 😂
Really, that was fucking weak. It takes less than ten seconds to find out.
Really, that was fucking weak. It takes less than ten seconds to find out.
Which is it? Because the NIH is definitely talking about the science, and it says you’re wrong.
Which is it? Because the NIH is definitely talking about the science, and it says you’re wrong.
www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...