Chris Halliday
banner
doctortoc.bsky.social
Chris Halliday
@doctortoc.bsky.social
Baldy, beardy, weirdy.
Writer, occultist, game designer, Dalek enthusiast.

https://argentgames.wordpress.com
April 14, 2025 at 1:15 PM
That’s probably the very first time either of those words have been applied to me 😂 Thank you 🙏
April 14, 2025 at 1:14 PM
Oooh, cool! 😎
March 6, 2025 at 4:08 PM
Oh dear 🤭
March 5, 2025 at 10:08 PM
We like you, we just don’t like the absolute clown show in power ❤️
March 5, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Owen’s a good guy 😊
March 5, 2025 at 10:04 PM
So…they’ve invented the tree?
February 26, 2025 at 10:00 PM
Well, fuck 🤦‍♂️
February 25, 2025 at 6:56 PM
Of course, you don’t give a shit about what the community wants. I forgot.
February 25, 2025 at 12:22 PM
“Genderists” 😂
February 25, 2025 at 12:15 PM
“NoNe Of ThOsE pEoPlE aRe RePuTaBle ScIeNtIsTs” 🤡
Yep, I called it. Anything that proves you wrong suddenly “isn’t valid”.
You asked for the science, you got it. You asked for scientists, you got them.
Your constantly shifting standards of proof shows the bad faith of your arguments.
February 25, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Wait, you’re using *wikipedia* as a reference? 😂
But Scientific American isn’t a reliable source? 😂
Consistency isn’t your strong suit, is it?
February 25, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Clinical geneticist Paul James (Royal Melbourne Hospital),
John Achermann (UCL Institute of Child Health),
Arthur Arnold (University of California),
Eric Vilain (University of California Center for Gender-Based Biology),
Vincent Harley (MIMR-PHI Institute for Medical Research).
You’re welcome 😂
February 25, 2025 at 12:04 PM
That’s a lie. The term “intersex” is the preferred term used by the community itself.
Really, that was fucking weak. It takes less than ten seconds to find out.
February 25, 2025 at 11:54 AM
I imagine that anything that disagrees with you is “not considered a trustworthy source” 😂
February 25, 2025 at 11:49 AM
Oh, so you’re moving the goalposts now? First you claim that your views are scientific, then when I disprove that, you start going the legislative route 😂
Which is it? Because the NIH is definitely talking about the science, and it says you’re wrong.
February 25, 2025 at 11:49 AM
Weird that respected journals like Scientific American and New Scientist disagree with you 🤔

www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-...
Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic
Biologists now think there is a larger spectrum than just binary female and male
www.scientificamerican.com
February 25, 2025 at 11:03 AM
Are you actually claiming that intersex people don’t exist? 😂
February 25, 2025 at 11:00 AM
It actually *is* science, dipshit. I’m not going to educate you on chromosomal variation or the wide variety of intersex people that exist, because your simplistic views on genome expression are sadly out of date. If you cared, you’d look it up. But you don’t, because you’re happy with your bigotry.
February 25, 2025 at 10:53 AM
Every MAGA accusation is a confession.
February 25, 2025 at 9:16 AM
I’m not taking science advice from a guy who looks like he’s legally required to stay a specific minimum distance from schools.
February 25, 2025 at 9:15 AM