✨ Stark, ravingly mad pro-abort ✨
LightNews LightNews
banner
dj.reprosky.xyz
✨ Stark, ravingly mad pro-abort ✨
@dj.reprosky.xyz
950 followers 2.9K following 300 posts
Repro comms. Abortion funder. Internet abortion guide. she/her, they/them 🍉

Views are my own and not those of my employer.

📍 “Heart of ANTIFA land”

#reprosky
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by ✨ Stark, ravingly mad pro-abort ✨
erininthemorning.com
2. Following a contentious newsroom battle at the BBC over allegations of political bias, it seems the media empire has given way to transphobic rhetoric—canonizing anti-trans talking points in one of the world’s most influential news outlets.
November 27, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Reposted by ✨ Stark, ravingly mad pro-abort ✨
karenho.bsky.social
A new kind of rapid Chotining. Please appreciate the alt-text.
Isaac Chotiner: "You would have to be brain-dead to read this piece and not immediately wonder who is funding Semafor Gulf." Quote post of Ben Smith saying: "Fascinating @msergie piece on covering a monarchy" about a Semafor article on Saudi Arabia's crown prince Smith responds to Chotiner: "That's a hell of an allegation/implication, Isaac. To figure out the literal answer to your question, you'd either have to look and see who the sponsors are in the email (I haven't checked today!) or read our publicly disclosed list of investors. I believe you're trying to imply that it's the Saudi government? Have you read more of our coverage, or just this tweet? My impression — correct me if I'm wrong — is that you're working on zero information and smearing us in general, and an experienced journalist @msergie whose work I suspect you're totally unfamiliar with in particular." Chotiner responds:"I’m not making any allegation. I’m making a simple point about how an average reader—myself included—might respond after reading this ridiculous piece" Ben Smith: "Just asking questions! Come on. You genuinely know better. Or read Mohammed's long career of work covering the Gulf and the Syrian war before you imply he's some kind of stooge." Noah Kulwin: "The point is not about who funds your reporting/if your colleague is a “stooge”. Isaac’s comment is that the reporting is so bad so as to make a reader wonder who is funding it" Smith: A reader, sure. A journalist who can do very basic homework, kind of lame. Chotiner: "You are right, I’ll do some homework now by perusing Jay Solomon Semafor pieces, and reading Jason Greenblatt Semafor columns. In the meantime, I will formally say that I am making no accusation and was just astonished at how inane the piece was" Chotiner quote-posts with "I see Semafor loves running column after column by this guy (https://semafor.com/author/faisal-j-abbas), who also publishes pro-Saudi conspiracies about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi https://arabnews.com/node/1386291" Ben Smith's post says "I hope I'm not overreacting, but it makes me crazy when people I think of as reporters do this "just asking questions" stuff. Feel free to report it out by googling/asking me/reading our various scoops and reports about the region — these two just now" and links to two Semafor articles Chotiner quote posts Ben Smith: "You might have heard that the UAE is helping destroy Sudan, but at the next Semafor event, all is well." Screenshot says "Held at Abu Dhabi Finance Week, Semafor will spotlight insights from the Global Findex 2025 report and the Global Digital Connectivity Tracker, translating global research into actionable, locally relevant conversations. As the third stop on The Next 3 Billion Tour, this edition explores how the Gulf's growing investments in Africa can accelerate digital connectivity and financial inclusion. With Abu Dhabi's focus on sustainable finance, digital transformation, and cross-border collaboration, it offers a strong platform to examine how technology and capital can work together to expand access and opportunity." Ben Smith's post says "Just asking questions! Come on. You genuinely know better. Or read Mohammed's long career of work covering the Gulf and the Syrian war before you imply he's some kind of stooge."
November 25, 2025 at 1:09 AM
dj.reprosky.xyz
I love this <3
November 25, 2025 at 8:12 AM
dj.reprosky.xyz
Seeing her husband's content makes it all make sense
November 24, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Reposted by ✨ Stark, ravingly mad pro-abort ✨
susanrinkunas.com
Independent providers like @queerdoc.bsky.social are stepping in as hospitals reduce or eliminate gender-affirming care, but this makes them easier to single out for harassment. It's a dynamic we've long seen in abortion care, as @garnethenderson.com notes
www.autonomynews.co/doj-subpoena...
screenshot 1/2 As states ban gender-affirming care and major hospitals and health systems stop providing it, it’s largely independent providers like QueerDoc that are filling the gaps—with a few notable exceptions, including Boston Children’s. Beal’s practice had already seen an influx of new patients due to state restrictions even before Trump took office, they said. And in Illinois, a network of independent providers who don’t rely on federally-funded programs like Medicaid have stepped in to continue patients’ gender-affirming care as local hospitals have backed off. screenshot 2/2 Beal is proud of the work independent practices are doing to support their patients, but also worries it could lead to violence against providers. Clinicians are organizing, Beal said, “to continue care when these large systems close.” “But then it is falling more on individual clinicians to make those things happen,” Beal added. “Which, if you have care siloed, it is also much easier to target those clinicians’ physical safety.” This mirrors a dynamic that has long existed in abortion care. The upside of specialized clinics is expert care and mission-driven staff. The downside is that these practices are easier to single out, whether for harassment, violence, or government surveillance.
November 19, 2025 at 10:38 PM