dino-monster.bsky.social
@dino-monster.bsky.social
Sounds like four fittings jack-offs right there.
December 13, 2025 at 5:26 PM
They’re gonna send everyone an 1/8 with their tariff rebate checks.
December 12, 2025 at 8:54 PM
Quaint to think like that but history says that’s not true at all.
December 12, 2025 at 5:21 PM
So what, just add it to list of things that we do that annoy people.
December 12, 2025 at 5:15 PM
Going to Tate for “dating” advice when your dad’s Trump is like if Jordan’s kids had Pippen teach him to play basketball.
December 12, 2025 at 4:08 AM
It gives red states the talking point to do nothing.
December 12, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Manchin is incapable of being a gutless squish, can never find the courage to have an opinion on anything.
December 12, 2025 at 1:30 AM
TV and social media are interchangeable in that statement.
December 11, 2025 at 10:07 PM
The position can’t be he’s stable enough to hold the head coaching job but not stable enough to be fired for it. He is not a victim.
December 11, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Josh Shapiro: Hold my beer.
December 10, 2025 at 5:36 PM
He’s the Cal Ripken of sticking your head up your own ass to avoid the news.
December 10, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Maybe ND should have campaigned against Bama instead of Miami. Y’all were more than happy when you thought it’d be Miami left out, but once it was you suddenly this nonexistent ACC brotherhood became real important.
December 8, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Do ND fans really think the ACC should be showing them deference over a full fledged member who beat them? You don’t get to parade around your independent status and then expect the full fledged support of a conference you won’t join at the expense of a conference member.
December 8, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Check urban dictionary, I assure you there will be confusion.
December 7, 2025 at 4:55 AM
I’m not political strategist but I’d advise winning over your own parties base before saying I’m going to win the oppositions.
December 5, 2025 at 8:30 PM
The reality is we have a DOJ running around saying we can do murders in international waters and SCOTUS that says states can do racism when it comes to voting. There is zero binding precedent on those groups, if the administration wants a paramount merger they’ll get it.
December 5, 2025 at 7:42 PM
That’s having a lot of faith in a group who haven’t met a racism they’re not ok with.
December 5, 2025 at 7:40 PM
The very high chance of succeeding is 50/50 at best depending solely on the judge it’s assigned too and which court gets to review the appeals, and if somehow it gets ran all the way to SCOTUS you actually think they’d block a merger with paramount? Everything you’re saying is based on the old rules
December 5, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Sure all that could happen, or it could be an extremely corrupt process where the DOJ blocks all mergers but paramount because that’s what the administration wants. Based on everything happening in America which of those seems more likely?
December 5, 2025 at 6:27 PM