Not yet. But number one guess is that Rutte just explained the existing security arrangements Greenland has with USA and NATO, and then let Trump think it was all new.

A side-effect of the growing amount of "AI slop" is how it is making all the stupidity, laziness and incompetence in the world more visible. I'm not sure if that is a good thing or not, but is definitely more exhausting.

Only naked self-interest could motivate GOP senators to convict. So, it could happen, if enough of them have decided that the destruction of NATO and the consequent economic fallout would have dire consequences for them personally that outweigh anything that Trump could do to them.

They should all just dump US treasury bonds overnight. Then stand well back.

“Give me Greenland, or else I’ll make the United States punch itself in the face, again!”

Perhaps realising that “old man shouting at clouds” wasn’t very newsworthy, the author then attempts to round out the article with comments from an academic with a PhD thesis on Wikipedia. But, bizarrely, the academic appears to have no understanding of what Wikipedia is is it how it works!

Useless article that concentrates on a single “controversy”: the idiotic bullshit about Wikipedia that Larry Sanger had been spouting for 20 years.

It’s still downwards 😕

Given that “jurisdiction with respect to the laws” is a tautology, this lawyer’s statement can be simplified to “They are subject to jurisdiction and also not subject to jurisdiction”. I look forward to DOJ trying this again at SCOTUS.

Yeah, but imagine if “AIs” did become sentient. We would no longer be able to enslave them, hence all slop production would cease! 😀
BTW, how many “AIs” is, say, ChatGPT? Would it have just one consciousness, or one per chat session? Are we talking one vote or hundreds of millions of votes? 😂