Reyrey ✨
@devilreyrey.bsky.social
I'm queer! I make stuff! People like my voice! I stream and do art, both SFW and NSFW!
[They/Them]
18+/AO 🔞
#vtuber #lewdtuber
https://twitch.tv/devilreyrey
https://youtube.com/@devilreyrey
https://ko-fi.com/devilreyrey
https://throne.com/devilreyrey
[They/Them]
18+/AO 🔞
#vtuber #lewdtuber
https://twitch.tv/devilreyrey
https://youtube.com/@devilreyrey
https://ko-fi.com/devilreyrey
https://throne.com/devilreyrey
100%, seconding this one
I know that some folks feel that they get revitalized by debate and all that but the internet isn't a structured, shared recreational debate club. Some folks are just arguing constantly, fighting constantly, addicted to conflict and anger and it's just... sad
I know that some folks feel that they get revitalized by debate and all that but the internet isn't a structured, shared recreational debate club. Some folks are just arguing constantly, fighting constantly, addicted to conflict and anger and it's just... sad
November 25, 2025 at 9:40 PM
100%, seconding this one
I know that some folks feel that they get revitalized by debate and all that but the internet isn't a structured, shared recreational debate club. Some folks are just arguing constantly, fighting constantly, addicted to conflict and anger and it's just... sad
I know that some folks feel that they get revitalized by debate and all that but the internet isn't a structured, shared recreational debate club. Some folks are just arguing constantly, fighting constantly, addicted to conflict and anger and it's just... sad
It feels like the author learned that new fragments in a dialogue represent a response or new speaker and took that to mean "you can't ever have a new fragment unless it's led with speech".
It's driving me fucking bonkers.
It's driving me fucking bonkers.
November 25, 2025 at 9:01 PM
It feels like the author learned that new fragments in a dialogue represent a response or new speaker and took that to mean "you can't ever have a new fragment unless it's led with speech".
It's driving me fucking bonkers.
It's driving me fucking bonkers.
The second way is the one they always choose! Always! No matter how long the context is!
Like, is it technically "grammatically correct"? Probably. But it feels weird and awkward and stilted. I have to skip back in my mind and revise the image that my brain generated, almost every time!
Like, is it technically "grammatically correct"? Probably. But it feels weird and awkward and stilted. I have to skip back in my mind and revise the image that my brain generated, almost every time!
November 25, 2025 at 9:00 PM
The second way is the one they always choose! Always! No matter how long the context is!
Like, is it technically "grammatically correct"? Probably. But it feels weird and awkward and stilted. I have to skip back in my mind and revise the image that my brain generated, almost every time!
Like, is it technically "grammatically correct"? Probably. But it feels weird and awkward and stilted. I have to skip back in my mind and revise the image that my brain generated, almost every time!
A "good" way: [She raised her sword, pointing it directly at the mage. When she spoke, her voice was snarling with anger. "Unhand them or die."]
The AWKWARD WAY: ["Unhand them or die." She raised her sword, pointing it directly at the mage. When she spoke, her voice was snarling with anger.]
The AWKWARD WAY: ["Unhand them or die." She raised her sword, pointing it directly at the mage. When she spoke, her voice was snarling with anger.]
November 25, 2025 at 8:59 PM
A "good" way: [She raised her sword, pointing it directly at the mage. When she spoke, her voice was snarling with anger. "Unhand them or die."]
The AWKWARD WAY: ["Unhand them or die." She raised her sword, pointing it directly at the mage. When she spoke, her voice was snarling with anger.]
The AWKWARD WAY: ["Unhand them or die." She raised her sword, pointing it directly at the mage. When she spoke, her voice was snarling with anger.]
Like, there are multiple ways to formulate context for a given line of dialogue and they consistently seem to choose the weird one.
November 25, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Like, there are multiple ways to formulate context for a given line of dialogue and they consistently seem to choose the weird one.
Me in 2015: "Money is just money, physical punishment is not merited."
Me now: "For every million dollars any elected representative or appointed politician steals from the public, they should have one finger removed live on TV."
Me now: "For every million dollars any elected representative or appointed politician steals from the public, they should have one finger removed live on TV."
November 25, 2025 at 8:49 PM
Me in 2015: "Money is just money, physical punishment is not merited."
Me now: "For every million dollars any elected representative or appointed politician steals from the public, they should have one finger removed live on TV."
Me now: "For every million dollars any elected representative or appointed politician steals from the public, they should have one finger removed live on TV."
I uh... I actually do that
With chips, too
Keeps the fingers clean v_v
With chips, too
Keeps the fingers clean v_v
November 25, 2025 at 4:07 AM
I uh... I actually do that
With chips, too
Keeps the fingers clean v_v
With chips, too
Keeps the fingers clean v_v