Progressive beliefs is when you compliment some of the cruelest men in history cause another cruel guy said something cruel?

I mean, in the context of education, all those past criticisms were true.

In any regard, if your learning "how to learn" things that remove the effort, result in less retention and understanding.

LLMs just take that removal of effort to a greater degree.

I mean, its not really that different from getting a tattoo or piercing, lol. All of them use sharp things to alter the body.

I'm 100% positive it exists in irl, lol

Well let's back up a bit. Most actual research suggests "the male loneliness epidemic" is a false dichotomy. This loneliness problem is shown to be effecting almost every demographic in the US.

We can talk about shitty guys without needing to continue to push narratives mostly meant for clickbait.

Example 1/1000: The aggressive homophobia and transphobia that was just a casual part of our media but also conversations with strangers!

Your not wrong that there are plenty of men like that.

But I just think it's obvious Joel's an academic nerd, and anyone using the methodology incorrectly towards a topic that is already full of misinformation, would make an academic nerd annoyed.

Duh, its cowardice!!!

Your gonna drop that BnB and you need to be okay with an online stranger thinking you're a idiot stinky goober, if you want to be free

You know what? It is weird to be mad about it, lol.

But people with niche interests and passions... get weirdly emotional about them. It's part of having interests.

Sure but I'm engaging with the text, not the headline.

I agree with the authors views on relationship red flags. But I do not think the way they wrote the text is compelling or true to the data provided.

Like there's not much else to say.

Cause A: nothing on a social level is ever that simple.

And B: that complexity is also on display in the same research the author linked, lol.

If you actually look through it, it's not just a study about men and women. It also includes race, sexuality, income, politics.

I mean, that's a fine hypothesis. "I think-" is not disqualification for value. Opinion can be valuable.

The issue is the author is not presenting an opinion. They assert a hyptotheis has been solved, with data to prove it... and the data does not.

I dont think theres any debate that the emotional labour sucks for women. That was never in question.

The entire point of the critique up top was the authors method of reaching a conclusion and how they sourced thr information to justify it.

After looking at the research closer, I'm more convinced the article author is being a little dishonest.

Men and women ages 18-39 have almost identical evals in that section.

That 30/60 split between men and women is specifically coming from people 40+. It's skewing the averages quite a bit.

Thank youuu this one's one of my favorites