@delaware-lawyer.bsky.social
Reposted
"But, rest assured, this will be the sixth time we have gone woke, and we have become exceedingly efficient at it."
February 15, 2026 at 9:49 AM
"But, rest assured, this will be the sixth time we have gone woke, and we have become exceedingly efficient at it."
Gonna file an expedited 220 into your mom’s stockholder list
February 14, 2026 at 6:28 PM
Gonna file an expedited 220 into your mom’s stockholder list
What is wrong with these people?
What is broken in their brains that they would willingly withhold food from hungry children (who are entirely dependent on their captors for food), and then just keep showing up to that job day after day?
Are there any of these jailers who view those kids as human?
What is broken in their brains that they would willingly withhold food from hungry children (who are entirely dependent on their captors for food), and then just keep showing up to that job day after day?
Are there any of these jailers who view those kids as human?
On Thanksgiving, the immigrant children held at the Dilley detention center gathered in the gym for what they thought was a holiday feast.
The kids salivated over a spread of turkey, sandwiches, pastries and pies, a family told me.
But the food wasn’t for detainees — it was for the staff.
The kids salivated over a spread of turkey, sandwiches, pastries and pies, a family told me.
But the food wasn’t for detainees — it was for the staff.
February 13, 2026 at 9:59 PM
What is wrong with these people?
What is broken in their brains that they would willingly withhold food from hungry children (who are entirely dependent on their captors for food), and then just keep showing up to that job day after day?
Are there any of these jailers who view those kids as human?
What is broken in their brains that they would willingly withhold food from hungry children (who are entirely dependent on their captors for food), and then just keep showing up to that job day after day?
Are there any of these jailers who view those kids as human?
Yeah, this is the economic argument against having first-line PCPs all be NPs and RNs. They order more testing, and more frequently make medical errors than MDs and DOs.
Hospitals and med systems will quickly reject this guys “discount” plan, because paying MDs and DOs is way more expensive.
Hospitals and med systems will quickly reject this guys “discount” plan, because paying MDs and DOs is way more expensive.
This Startup’s Clever Way To Cut Health Costs Helped It Hit A $1.4 Billion Valuation
This Startup’s Clever Way To Cut Health Costs Helped It Hit A $1.4 Billion Valuation
Garner Health uses data to identify the country’s best doctors based on quality and cost, then gives its customers’ employees financial incentives to go to them — which can save 12% on healthcare cost...
www.forbes.com
February 12, 2026 at 6:42 PM
Yeah, this is the economic argument against having first-line PCPs all be NPs and RNs. They order more testing, and more frequently make medical errors than MDs and DOs.
Hospitals and med systems will quickly reject this guys “discount” plan, because paying MDs and DOs is way more expensive.
Hospitals and med systems will quickly reject this guys “discount” plan, because paying MDs and DOs is way more expensive.
I mean, isn’t “on the securities market, yes” by and large the correct answer there?
Maybe too in the weeds for TV, but as I understand it, in futures, insider trading prohibitions are much narrower. So a stance that it’s bad (if not illegal) would be kind of weird for the SEC commissioner to take.
Maybe too in the weeds for TV, but as I understand it, in futures, insider trading prohibitions are much narrower. So a stance that it’s bad (if not illegal) would be kind of weird for the SEC commissioner to take.
WATCH: Trump’s SEC Commissioner just refused to say ‘insider trading is bad.’
February 12, 2026 at 6:26 PM
I mean, isn’t “on the securities market, yes” by and large the correct answer there?
Maybe too in the weeds for TV, but as I understand it, in futures, insider trading prohibitions are much narrower. So a stance that it’s bad (if not illegal) would be kind of weird for the SEC commissioner to take.
Maybe too in the weeds for TV, but as I understand it, in futures, insider trading prohibitions are much narrower. So a stance that it’s bad (if not illegal) would be kind of weird for the SEC commissioner to take.
I’ve been thinking about how, as a lawyer, I’ve had to swear to “uphold and defend the US constitution” in some version at least four different times:
1. Applying to law school
2. Applying to sit for my state’s bar exam
3. Being admitted as an Attorney
4. Being admitted to a Federal Court’s bar
1. Applying to law school
2. Applying to sit for my state’s bar exam
3. Being admitted as an Attorney
4. Being admitted to a Federal Court’s bar
February 10, 2026 at 4:40 PM
I’ve been thinking about how, as a lawyer, I’ve had to swear to “uphold and defend the US constitution” in some version at least four different times:
1. Applying to law school
2. Applying to sit for my state’s bar exam
3. Being admitted as an Attorney
4. Being admitted to a Federal Court’s bar
1. Applying to law school
2. Applying to sit for my state’s bar exam
3. Being admitted as an Attorney
4. Being admitted to a Federal Court’s bar
Hell yeah, build me Titanic 2! It can’t sink again!
Modern technology is indomitable by the petty and weak forces of nature. I LAUGH at the pathetic ocean even attempting to conquer my unsinkable aluminum ship (inspired by spider secrets).
Modern technology is indomitable by the petty and weak forces of nature. I LAUGH at the pathetic ocean even attempting to conquer my unsinkable aluminum ship (inspired by spider secrets).
Researchers mimicked the air-trapping tricks of diving bell spiders to create aluminum that stays afloat—even when punctured
Unsinkable metal discovery could build safer ships and harvest wave energy
Researchers mimicked the air-trapping tricks of diving bell spiders to create aluminum that stays afloat—even when punctured
www.scientificamerican.com
February 3, 2026 at 5:16 PM
Hell yeah, build me Titanic 2! It can’t sink again!
Modern technology is indomitable by the petty and weak forces of nature. I LAUGH at the pathetic ocean even attempting to conquer my unsinkable aluminum ship (inspired by spider secrets).
Modern technology is indomitable by the petty and weak forces of nature. I LAUGH at the pathetic ocean even attempting to conquer my unsinkable aluminum ship (inspired by spider secrets).
Not a ton of reporting on it, but I grow worried about the “fight” being teed up for SCOTUS on whether a Federal Court can issue/enforce an injunction that actually undoes an illegal presidential order.
January 1, 2026 at 1:26 AM
Not a ton of reporting on it, but I grow worried about the “fight” being teed up for SCOTUS on whether a Federal Court can issue/enforce an injunction that actually undoes an illegal presidential order.
These shenanigans and the rigmarole have got to stop. Enough is enough.
If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you shouldn’t be owning a McDonald’s.
If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you shouldn’t be owning a McDonald’s.
November 18, 2025 at 5:16 PM
These shenanigans and the rigmarole have got to stop. Enough is enough.
If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you shouldn’t be owning a McDonald’s.
If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you shouldn’t be owning a McDonald’s.
I was assured that such a cave would not occur under Generalissimo Mamdani’s leadership. Zohran will NOT be pleased to hear of this insolence.
November 10, 2025 at 1:24 AM
I was assured that such a cave would not occur under Generalissimo Mamdani’s leadership. Zohran will NOT be pleased to hear of this insolence.
SCOTUS see blue wave
SCOTUS need to protect economy, ensure GOP can win in future
SCOTUS decide some tariffs illegal
PLOT TWIST: POTUS DGAF what SCOTUS says, and continues to burn everything down
Pic: SCOTUS’ reaction
SCOTUS need to protect economy, ensure GOP can win in future
SCOTUS decide some tariffs illegal
PLOT TWIST: POTUS DGAF what SCOTUS says, and continues to burn everything down
Pic: SCOTUS’ reaction
November 5, 2025 at 5:57 PM
SCOTUS see blue wave
SCOTUS need to protect economy, ensure GOP can win in future
SCOTUS decide some tariffs illegal
PLOT TWIST: POTUS DGAF what SCOTUS says, and continues to burn everything down
Pic: SCOTUS’ reaction
SCOTUS need to protect economy, ensure GOP can win in future
SCOTUS decide some tariffs illegal
PLOT TWIST: POTUS DGAF what SCOTUS says, and continues to burn everything down
Pic: SCOTUS’ reaction
Hey it’s me, your buddy. I no longer work for the CFTC, that was SOOOO long ago. I barely remember being a CFTC employee!
October 24, 2025 at 4:18 AM
Hey it’s me, your buddy. I no longer work for the CFTC, that was SOOOO long ago. I barely remember being a CFTC employee!
Curious to see if the output of an AI can be used to satisfy the pleading standard, RE Robby Starbuck.
I know he also alleged in person interactions, but if an AI output alone is enough to substantiate damages and intentionality of defamation—we’re so fucked.
I know he also alleged in person interactions, but if an AI output alone is enough to substantiate damages and intentionality of defamation—we’re so fucked.
October 23, 2025 at 9:34 PM
Curious to see if the output of an AI can be used to satisfy the pleading standard, RE Robby Starbuck.
I know he also alleged in person interactions, but if an AI output alone is enough to substantiate damages and intentionality of defamation—we’re so fucked.
I know he also alleged in person interactions, but if an AI output alone is enough to substantiate damages and intentionality of defamation—we’re so fucked.
Not to put too fine a point on it—but you also can’t unilaterally declare something “off the record” even if you say that beforehand.
You both have to be in agreement.
A meeting of the minds, as it were. Offer, acceptance. Mutual assent.
You both have to be in agreement.
A meeting of the minds, as it were. Offer, acceptance. Mutual assent.
October 21, 2025 at 2:19 PM
Not to put too fine a point on it—but you also can’t unilaterally declare something “off the record” even if you say that beforehand.
You both have to be in agreement.
A meeting of the minds, as it were. Offer, acceptance. Mutual assent.
You both have to be in agreement.
A meeting of the minds, as it were. Offer, acceptance. Mutual assent.
Pretty sure “274 agents” is just the number of J6 losers that turned face when they got caught and snitched on their fellow traitors, I.e. “informants”
Honestly seems low
Honestly seems low
October 13, 2025 at 2:50 AM
Pretty sure “274 agents” is just the number of J6 losers that turned face when they got caught and snitched on their fellow traitors, I.e. “informants”
Honestly seems low
Honestly seems low
I would like to nominate Justice Jackson for the reverse Taft (with a back-twist). SCOTUS to POTUS then back to SCOTUS.
October 5, 2025 at 2:28 PM
I would like to nominate Justice Jackson for the reverse Taft (with a back-twist). SCOTUS to POTUS then back to SCOTUS.
The text of the second amendment is a lot more protective of “states can have and control their own national guards” than it is “every man woman and child gets one.”
And yet, not seeing any 2A fanatics out here screeching about the presidents nationalizing state guards against the state’s will.
And yet, not seeing any 2A fanatics out here screeching about the presidents nationalizing state guards against the state’s will.
October 5, 2025 at 12:32 PM
The text of the second amendment is a lot more protective of “states can have and control their own national guards” than it is “every man woman and child gets one.”
And yet, not seeing any 2A fanatics out here screeching about the presidents nationalizing state guards against the state’s will.
And yet, not seeing any 2A fanatics out here screeching about the presidents nationalizing state guards against the state’s will.
As apocryphal as the claims are, I still see orange carrots as a symbol of European monarchy.
To that end, it is the duty of every American to reject the orange root, and consume only non-orange carrots (purple and whatnot).
No kings means no kings, even in stews
To that end, it is the duty of every American to reject the orange root, and consume only non-orange carrots (purple and whatnot).
No kings means no kings, even in stews
October 3, 2025 at 1:45 PM
As apocryphal as the claims are, I still see orange carrots as a symbol of European monarchy.
To that end, it is the duty of every American to reject the orange root, and consume only non-orange carrots (purple and whatnot).
No kings means no kings, even in stews
To that end, it is the duty of every American to reject the orange root, and consume only non-orange carrots (purple and whatnot).
No kings means no kings, even in stews
New add-ons to the roster for the Third Founding’s key first amendment cases:
Kimmel v. Carr
IceBlock v. Bondi
More to come, I’m sure!
Kimmel v. Carr
IceBlock v. Bondi
More to come, I’m sure!
October 3, 2025 at 1:34 PM
New add-ons to the roster for the Third Founding’s key first amendment cases:
Kimmel v. Carr
IceBlock v. Bondi
More to come, I’m sure!
Kimmel v. Carr
IceBlock v. Bondi
More to come, I’m sure!
Shutting down your own government is associated with cowardly desperados, and the despised Ku Klux Klan.
The GOP lacks honor.
The GOP lacks honor.
October 1, 2025 at 6:42 PM
Shutting down your own government is associated with cowardly desperados, and the despised Ku Klux Klan.
The GOP lacks honor.
The GOP lacks honor.
Knowing how petty these guys can be, I’m betting we see Marines in masks by week’s end.
October 1, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Knowing how petty these guys can be, I’m betting we see Marines in masks by week’s end.
What if it was actually an escalator moving straight towards the assassins, and the only way to save the President was to stop it
September 24, 2025 at 4:04 AM
What if it was actually an escalator moving straight towards the assassins, and the only way to save the President was to stop it
Just really curious on one point with MAHA: when was America healthy? Like what specific date is their benchmark for “going back” to?
September 19, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Just really curious on one point with MAHA: when was America healthy? Like what specific date is their benchmark for “going back” to?
Thinking about this one a lot lately. The ideological precursors to RFK Jr.’s current anti-vax crusade were such pieces of shit from the very start. And the movement has only gotten worse since.
Vaccines and Autism: A Measured Response
YouTube video by hbomberguy
m.youtube.com
September 18, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Thinking about this one a lot lately. The ideological precursors to RFK Jr.’s current anti-vax crusade were such pieces of shit from the very start. And the movement has only gotten worse since.
Reposted
The WaPo’s law and politics columnist doesn’t understand that Murthy was a standing ruling— a decision fundamentally about states trying to intervene on behalf of alleged jawboning victims with a handful of individual plaintiffs thrown in as an afterthought— and ignores Vullo entirely.
Yikes.
Yikes.
September 18, 2025 at 10:49 AM
The WaPo’s law and politics columnist doesn’t understand that Murthy was a standing ruling— a decision fundamentally about states trying to intervene on behalf of alleged jawboning victims with a handful of individual plaintiffs thrown in as an afterthought— and ignores Vullo entirely.
Yikes.
Yikes.