Egon Dejonckheere
@dejonckheeregon.bsky.social
Assistant professor @TilburgUniversity | Co-founder of m-Path.io | #EMA / #ESM research | Digital technology in mental health care | DJ
PS: The app also look great in Chinese 🍜!
November 26, 2025 at 11:10 AM
PS: The app also look great in Chinese 🍜!
👉 Full O-A paper here: formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e77036
Leveraging No-Code Digital Platforms for Designing an Integrated Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Intervention With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Mental Health Care: Development and Usability ...
Background: The rising burden of disease associated with mental disorders calls for evidence-based psychological interventions that can be swiftly scaled up. Blending smartphone-based mental health ap...
formative.jmir.org
November 26, 2025 at 11:10 AM
👉 Full O-A paper here: formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e77036
However, they showcase m-Path can be the alternative:
✔️ Full researcher independence in developing the app
✔️ Flexible building blocks they can fully tailor
✔️ Fast, theory-driven EMI development
✔️ A validated end product that outlives a single project or grant
✔️ Full researcher independence in developing the app
✔️ Flexible building blocks they can fully tailor
✔️ Fast, theory-driven EMI development
✔️ A validated end product that outlives a single project or grant
November 26, 2025 at 11:10 AM
However, they showcase m-Path can be the alternative:
✔️ Full researcher independence in developing the app
✔️ Flexible building blocks they can fully tailor
✔️ Fast, theory-driven EMI development
✔️ A validated end product that outlives a single project or grant
✔️ Full researcher independence in developing the app
✔️ Flexible building blocks they can fully tailor
✔️ Fast, theory-driven EMI development
✔️ A validated end product that outlives a single project or grant
In their review of 149 mental health apps, only 28.9% were publicly available and just *8.3%* could be adapted!
This highlights :
❌ Single-study apps are often not shared
❌ Prototypes aren’t flexible or maintainable
❌ Costly developer dependence
❌ Content that can’t be adapted afterward
This highlights :
❌ Single-study apps are often not shared
❌ Prototypes aren’t flexible or maintainable
❌ Costly developer dependence
❌ Content that can’t be adapted afterward
November 26, 2025 at 11:10 AM
In their review of 149 mental health apps, only 28.9% were publicly available and just *8.3%* could be adapted!
This highlights :
❌ Single-study apps are often not shared
❌ Prototypes aren’t flexible or maintainable
❌ Costly developer dependence
❌ Content that can’t be adapted afterward
This highlights :
❌ Single-study apps are often not shared
❌ Prototypes aren’t flexible or maintainable
❌ Costly developer dependence
❌ Content that can’t be adapted afterward
Thanks! Probably at APS indeed!
November 20, 2025 at 4:21 PM
Thanks! Probably at APS indeed!
Almost Simpson’s paradox!
November 20, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Almost Simpson’s paradox!
Lol, not sure if the double negative in your second sentence is what you meant 😦😘?!
November 14, 2025 at 8:36 AM
Lol, not sure if the double negative in your second sentence is what you meant 😦😘?!
M-path has a follow-up item specifically designed for that (see: manual.m-path.io/knowledge-ba...). No need to make different duplicates, protocols or versions!
Follow up item – manual
manual.m-path.io
November 14, 2025 at 6:13 AM
M-path has a follow-up item specifically designed for that (see: manual.m-path.io/knowledge-ba...). No need to make different duplicates, protocols or versions!
Yes, easily done in m-Path. Feel free to reach out to us! (m-Path.io)
November 14, 2025 at 5:32 AM
Yes, easily done in m-Path. Feel free to reach out to us! (m-Path.io)
Makes sense! Also interesting to see that it does not affect careless responding, as i would have thought that pay-per-beep makes people obsessed with completing all beeps, bur not carefully per se (a bit in line with what we found in another study). Cool findings!
October 3, 2025 at 4:38 PM
Makes sense! Also interesting to see that it does not affect careless responding, as i would have thought that pay-per-beep makes people obsessed with completing all beeps, bur not carefully per se (a bit in line with what we found in another study). Cool findings!
Haha, I found the poster trough your link!
October 3, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Haha, I found the poster trough your link!
Interesting! Since some meta-analyses did not find such an effect. Any ideas what you could have done differently?
If there is preprint available could you notifiy me? Or could I have a look at the poster? Couldn't attend the network meeting this year, unfortunately!
If there is preprint available could you notifiy me? Or could I have a look at the poster? Couldn't attend the network meeting this year, unfortunately!
October 3, 2025 at 1:58 PM
Interesting! Since some meta-analyses did not find such an effect. Any ideas what you could have done differently?
If there is preprint available could you notifiy me? Or could I have a look at the poster? Couldn't attend the network meeting this year, unfortunately!
If there is preprint available could you notifiy me? Or could I have a look at the poster? Couldn't attend the network meeting this year, unfortunately!