Deeyablo
@deeyablo.bsky.social
But, you know, it was totally about Maduro and fentanyl. Not oil.
January 7, 2026 at 12:45 AM
But, you know, it was totally about Maduro and fentanyl. Not oil.
After that...
E. Limits on lobbying and SuperPACs
F. Breakup Media Ownership
G. Revamp inheritance and capital gains tax code
H. Universal health care
I. Revise laws around the use of stocks as collateral for borrowing from banks
J. Limit corporate ownership of single family dwellings
E. Limits on lobbying and SuperPACs
F. Breakup Media Ownership
G. Revamp inheritance and capital gains tax code
H. Universal health care
I. Revise laws around the use of stocks as collateral for borrowing from banks
J. Limit corporate ownership of single family dwellings
December 24, 2025 at 1:48 PM
After that...
E. Limits on lobbying and SuperPACs
F. Breakup Media Ownership
G. Revamp inheritance and capital gains tax code
H. Universal health care
I. Revise laws around the use of stocks as collateral for borrowing from banks
J. Limit corporate ownership of single family dwellings
E. Limits on lobbying and SuperPACs
F. Breakup Media Ownership
G. Revamp inheritance and capital gains tax code
H. Universal health care
I. Revise laws around the use of stocks as collateral for borrowing from banks
J. Limit corporate ownership of single family dwellings
Impossible from a day one, but the things we need, requiring sweeps in congress and the white house...
A. Pack the Supreme Court (3-5)
B. Eliminate gerrymandering
C. Overturn Citizens United
D. Eliminate direct stock ownership by Congress and President.
To start.
A. Pack the Supreme Court (3-5)
B. Eliminate gerrymandering
C. Overturn Citizens United
D. Eliminate direct stock ownership by Congress and President.
To start.
December 24, 2025 at 1:43 PM
Impossible from a day one, but the things we need, requiring sweeps in congress and the white house...
A. Pack the Supreme Court (3-5)
B. Eliminate gerrymandering
C. Overturn Citizens United
D. Eliminate direct stock ownership by Congress and President.
To start.
A. Pack the Supreme Court (3-5)
B. Eliminate gerrymandering
C. Overturn Citizens United
D. Eliminate direct stock ownership by Congress and President.
To start.
Fighting to preserve democracy doesn't prove it didn't work. Fighting anti-democratic efforts is like the tolerance paradox. Being tolerant of intolerance doesn't net you more tolerance. Democratically empowered anti-democracy does not lead to democracy.
December 24, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Fighting to preserve democracy doesn't prove it didn't work. Fighting anti-democratic efforts is like the tolerance paradox. Being tolerant of intolerance doesn't net you more tolerance. Democratically empowered anti-democracy does not lead to democracy.
They would vote for him to have a 3rd term.
December 23, 2025 at 8:49 AM
They would vote for him to have a 3rd term.
When you're the chief clitigator, you can achieve email completion however you want.
December 19, 2025 at 1:56 PM
When you're the chief clitigator, you can achieve email completion however you want.
They must? Oh, Republicans will prove you wrong on that, any day. What they should do and will do are two very different things.
December 17, 2025 at 7:10 AM
They must? Oh, Republicans will prove you wrong on that, any day. What they should do and will do are two very different things.
People who live in "Cancer Alley" (portion of the Mississippi) can actively witness companies dump toxic waste, witness the impact it has had on their families, see the promised jobs never materialize, and STILL think the EPA will ruin everything.
Corporations and The Right are very effective.
Corporations and The Right are very effective.
December 16, 2025 at 4:28 PM
People who live in "Cancer Alley" (portion of the Mississippi) can actively witness companies dump toxic waste, witness the impact it has had on their families, see the promised jobs never materialize, and STILL think the EPA will ruin everything.
Corporations and The Right are very effective.
Corporations and The Right are very effective.
To them, voting for Democrats means jobs will disappear, babies will be killed, their bank accounts will be emptied and the money given to immigrants and minorities, that Christianity will be illegal, that little children will have gender affirming surgeries.
So, they'd rather support the pedo.
So, they'd rather support the pedo.
December 16, 2025 at 4:24 PM
To them, voting for Democrats means jobs will disappear, babies will be killed, their bank accounts will be emptied and the money given to immigrants and minorities, that Christianity will be illegal, that little children will have gender affirming surgeries.
So, they'd rather support the pedo.
So, they'd rather support the pedo.
They can actually get hard evidence that Trump had sex with underage teens, and they will still weigh their options and say he was the only choice. Christians will recount the story of King David being an imperfect man chosen to lead.
All of that because they "KNOW" that government is pure evil.
All of that because they "KNOW" that government is pure evil.
December 16, 2025 at 4:21 PM
They can actually get hard evidence that Trump had sex with underage teens, and they will still weigh their options and say he was the only choice. Christians will recount the story of King David being an imperfect man chosen to lead.
All of that because they "KNOW" that government is pure evil.
All of that because they "KNOW" that government is pure evil.
You know what the bad thing is?
They feel conflicted in their love. They don't feel conflicted in their vote. They won't until they are personally impacted in a way that forces a perspective change.
Read "Strangers in Their Own Land." Good exploration of the mindset via interviews.
They feel conflicted in their love. They don't feel conflicted in their vote. They won't until they are personally impacted in a way that forces a perspective change.
Read "Strangers in Their Own Land." Good exploration of the mindset via interviews.
December 16, 2025 at 4:18 PM
You know what the bad thing is?
They feel conflicted in their love. They don't feel conflicted in their vote. They won't until they are personally impacted in a way that forces a perspective change.
Read "Strangers in Their Own Land." Good exploration of the mindset via interviews.
They feel conflicted in their love. They don't feel conflicted in their vote. They won't until they are personally impacted in a way that forces a perspective change.
Read "Strangers in Their Own Land." Good exploration of the mindset via interviews.
Was at the top for me, and it felt very right.
December 16, 2025 at 4:15 PM
Was at the top for me, and it felt very right.
I did like the "we only had to cut off one of your arms" analogy. The numbers improved over insanely dismal numbers in October. It's still bad, just not as terrifying as it was. Certainly not as good as when Biden handed the reins over.
December 16, 2025 at 4:14 PM
I did like the "we only had to cut off one of your arms" analogy. The numbers improved over insanely dismal numbers in October. It's still bad, just not as terrifying as it was. Certainly not as good as when Biden handed the reins over.
Sometimes,the lede is buried. Not always For example, I find that Axios does a respectable job of not burying the lede.
We do have to be a bit cautious regarding relying on headlines to convey a point. We don't have to write books, but, you know... a morsel of context.
We do have to be a bit cautious regarding relying on headlines to convey a point. We don't have to write books, but, you know... a morsel of context.
December 16, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Sometimes,the lede is buried. Not always For example, I find that Axios does a respectable job of not burying the lede.
We do have to be a bit cautious regarding relying on headlines to convey a point. We don't have to write books, but, you know... a morsel of context.
We do have to be a bit cautious regarding relying on headlines to convey a point. We don't have to write books, but, you know... a morsel of context.
This poem leaves my lips a little too often these days.
a man in a tuxedo is sitting in an auditorium
ALT: a man in a tuxedo is sitting in an auditorium
media.tenor.com
December 16, 2025 at 2:53 PM
This poem leaves my lips a little too often these days.
All about perspective, and our addiction to headlines. None of it is necessarily wrong, just not giving the full picture.
There was a jump in job growth over October. That doesn't speak to the overall unemployment numbers. It also doesn't account for "why."
There was a jump in job growth over October. That doesn't speak to the overall unemployment numbers. It also doesn't account for "why."
December 16, 2025 at 2:50 PM
All about perspective, and our addiction to headlines. None of it is necessarily wrong, just not giving the full picture.
There was a jump in job growth over October. That doesn't speak to the overall unemployment numbers. It also doesn't account for "why."
There was a jump in job growth over October. That doesn't speak to the overall unemployment numbers. It also doesn't account for "why."
Remember when they used to claim they wanted to leave it up to the states? Good times.
November 9, 2025 at 6:50 AM
Remember when they used to claim they wanted to leave it up to the states? Good times.
I might need to check that out. But definitely finish Isolation.
September 28, 2025 at 11:38 AM
I might need to check that out. But definitely finish Isolation.
Where would you fit Isolation in, if it was a movie?
September 24, 2025 at 4:12 PM
Where would you fit Isolation in, if it was a movie?
I'm excited for you. I wish I could watch it again for the first time.
September 24, 2025 at 4:11 PM
I'm excited for you. I wish I could watch it again for the first time.
Your firing was not just, and this apology is not necessary. You were right. The other side has ZERO problem being far more accusatory with fat less accuracy when the left is targeted with violence.
MSNBC = Making Strong Nationalists Because Cowardice
MSNBC = Making Strong Nationalists Because Cowardice
September 11, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Your firing was not just, and this apology is not necessary. You were right. The other side has ZERO problem being far more accusatory with fat less accuracy when the left is targeted with violence.
MSNBC = Making Strong Nationalists Because Cowardice
MSNBC = Making Strong Nationalists Because Cowardice
Truly, a profile in courage.
Cruz couldn't muster the stones to defend his own wife from the best buddy of the most famous trafficker in modern history.
Cruz couldn't muster the stones to defend his own wife from the best buddy of the most famous trafficker in modern history.
September 4, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Truly, a profile in courage.
Cruz couldn't muster the stones to defend his own wife from the best buddy of the most famous trafficker in modern history.
Cruz couldn't muster the stones to defend his own wife from the best buddy of the most famous trafficker in modern history.
I mean... TVU. So, yeah.
August 17, 2025 at 1:28 AM
I mean... TVU. So, yeah.