She sounds like a monster.
She’s curating the symbols of humanity because she’s lost the lived contact with the thing itself. Performative gibber.

The irony is total:
Her tweet accuses another of being less human,
but the very need to perform that accusation proves how much of her own humanity has been outsourced to the machine of image.

This just comes across as you flinching.

So the moral name-calling functions as an access token, a checksum verifying that the speaker aligns with the dominant coordination layer of the intelligentsia.
In complex-systems terms: it’s an error-correction packet, not a moral insight.

"The BBC lying to retards is good actually..."

I wish bsky had a translate button for this post.

Adil Ray is a divisive race grifter who advocates for Sharia law. He's a disgrace.

You're a communist, not a Christian.

Aside: Jim Jones was a Marxist Leftist of course. Makes sense, when you think about it.

They mistake information for relevance, and commentary for wisdom.

Their model of “explaining the world” is structurally incapable of handling the network age. A medium that once curated trust but now only amplifies its own loss. The problem isn’t that they are biased; it’s that they’re obsolete.

The News Agents still operate within the propositional tyranny of 20th-century broadcast cognition. They treat communication as transmission: message → audience, instead of participation in distributed sense-making. Their epistemic architecture is brittle: still optimized for control, not emergence

Trans is a dangerous social contagion that is damaging to young people. Adult promoting it should be ashamed.

This is a market malfunction. The News Agents are a late-stage fiat media instrument: minting attention-tokens with no ontological backing. Each story is an emotional derivative, leverage on fear, trust, and spectacle.

We're not obliged to pay for any of those.

It's valid considering he's the leader of the biggest party. You support democracy, right?

Who democratises the democratisers?
Regulation at this scale inevitably ossifies into central control: a new monopoly justified as virtue.

Absurd outrage theatre.

A truly adaptive system would fork: allow plural informational nodes to compete, cross-validate, and eventually merge around emergent trust patterns. Abolishing or reforming the BBC isn’t a cause of polarisation; it might be the necessary phase transition to stabilise a new epistemic order.

In that context, the hand-waving from legacy media bods reads as a systems-preservation fallacy. When feedback loops are corrupted, maintaining the system “for stability” actually increases entropy. You end up with performative coherence masking thermodynamic collapse.