Davide Pace
@ddpace.bsky.social
Behavioral economist at LMU Munich - opinions are mine.
Working on: cognitive economics and climate change.
https://sites.google.com/view/davidedpace
Working on: cognitive economics and climate change.
https://sites.google.com/view/davidedpace
Thank you Ala for the quick clarification! This analysis indeed goes against the alternative interpretation.
Just puzzling that taking away TdF exposure further decreases votes for the FR (if I read it correctly). The effects are indeed small, but the are up to 33% and 50% of your main estimates.
Just puzzling that taking away TdF exposure further decreases votes for the FR (if I read it correctly). The effects are indeed small, but the are up to 33% and 50% of your main estimates.
September 16, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Thank you Ala for the quick clarification! This analysis indeed goes against the alternative interpretation.
Just puzzling that taking away TdF exposure further decreases votes for the FR (if I read it correctly). The effects are indeed small, but the are up to 33% and 50% of your main estimates.
Just puzzling that taking away TdF exposure further decreases votes for the FR (if I read it correctly). The effects are indeed small, but the are up to 33% and 50% of your main estimates.
Cool!!
Can you also exclude the following competing interpretation of the treatment effect? "The TdF increases perceived inequality between towns which leads people living in not visited towns to increase their support for the far-right?"
More technically, what does ensure that SUTVA holds?
Can you also exclude the following competing interpretation of the treatment effect? "The TdF increases perceived inequality between towns which leads people living in not visited towns to increase their support for the far-right?"
More technically, what does ensure that SUTVA holds?
September 16, 2025 at 12:35 PM
Cool!!
Can you also exclude the following competing interpretation of the treatment effect? "The TdF increases perceived inequality between towns which leads people living in not visited towns to increase their support for the far-right?"
More technically, what does ensure that SUTVA holds?
Can you also exclude the following competing interpretation of the treatment effect? "The TdF increases perceived inequality between towns which leads people living in not visited towns to increase their support for the far-right?"
More technically, what does ensure that SUTVA holds?
4️⃣ Both the public and experts are too pessimistic
about voters’ support for climate policies
5️⃣ Effective communication of the climate policy
details is key
3/3
about voters’ support for climate policies
5️⃣ Effective communication of the climate policy
details is key
3/3
May 5, 2025 at 8:21 AM
4️⃣ Both the public and experts are too pessimistic
about voters’ support for climate policies
5️⃣ Effective communication of the climate policy
details is key
3/3
about voters’ support for climate policies
5️⃣ Effective communication of the climate policy
details is key
3/3
2️⃣ Voters support green investments even when
the investments are funded via carbon taxes
3️⃣ A carbon tax plus a Climate Premium is another
promising policy. The Climate Premium is
an upfront transfer to all households
2/3
the investments are funded via carbon taxes
3️⃣ A carbon tax plus a Climate Premium is another
promising policy. The Climate Premium is
an upfront transfer to all households
2/3
May 5, 2025 at 8:21 AM
2️⃣ Voters support green investments even when
the investments are funded via carbon taxes
3️⃣ A carbon tax plus a Climate Premium is another
promising policy. The Climate Premium is
an upfront transfer to all households
2/3
the investments are funded via carbon taxes
3️⃣ A carbon tax plus a Climate Premium is another
promising policy. The Climate Premium is
an upfront transfer to all households
2/3
So sorry, Valeria... Crazy times...
April 21, 2025 at 8:00 AM
So sorry, Valeria... Crazy times...
Why creating a fund only targeted to current US-based researchers? There are other (turning) illiberal countries with top scientists. Besides, competition is also about retaining talent.
It is a great moment to invest more on research, but what are the advantages of the geographical constraint?
It is a great moment to invest more on research, but what are the advantages of the geographical constraint?
April 1, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Why creating a fund only targeted to current US-based researchers? There are other (turning) illiberal countries with top scientists. Besides, competition is also about retaining talent.
It is a great moment to invest more on research, but what are the advantages of the geographical constraint?
It is a great moment to invest more on research, but what are the advantages of the geographical constraint?