dbgbdwolf.bsky.social
@dbgbdwolf.bsky.social
Manual driver, coder, telecom industry, Ohio to Florida (Rhodes to DeSantis)
Maybe he'll feel the same if the next Dem President sends him to a black site overseas after a judge says they can't. We should find out.
November 29, 2025 at 3:40 AM
Someone writes an article calling him a lame duck, he starts talking about 'Trump 2028.' He's Pavlov's Asshole.
November 28, 2025 at 8:16 PM
Nominations approved by the Senate don't have anything to do with an autopen.
November 28, 2025 at 8:11 PM
I started the Gor series as a teen. It went WILDLY sideways enough that I quit a few books in.
November 26, 2025 at 4:07 AM
One simple trick to remove opposing party members of Congress: Recall them to active duty and force them to resign their seats!
November 25, 2025 at 2:36 PM
WH Advisors: "Well, sure, but he's no Sinema."
November 25, 2025 at 3:55 AM
At a minimum, upon entry and after six months and upon reenlistment. In practice, at least once a year in my experience.
November 25, 2025 at 1:55 AM
Judge doesn't think it's unclear. Footnote 21, with citations to similar cases.
November 25, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Narrator: The dismissal was, in fact, not at all stunning.
November 25, 2025 at 12:36 AM
These people are weird. If I'm dressed for bed, I'm going to pretty nice to whoever I'm with...
November 24, 2025 at 10:59 PM
The DOJ is fighting all the "you have to follow the law in appointing US Attorneys" cases, so this one will just be added to the pile of appeals.

Since Congress has the Constitutional power to set how this has to be done and the Trump admin keeps violating it, I'm not sure DOJ gets around it.
November 24, 2025 at 8:23 PM
The judge addressed that. A dismissed indictment can extend the statute of limitations, but, in this case, the indictment is void, which doesn't extend the statute of limitations.

The extension is there (in part) so prosecutors can use superseding indictments after the statute of limitations.
November 24, 2025 at 8:09 PM
The judge discusses that. The prosecutor didn't violate the law, which would require dismissal with prejudice. Her APPOINTMENT violated the law, which requires dismissal without prejudice, because a legally-appointed prosecutor could bring charges (except for the statute of limitations.)
November 24, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Sending people checks for a couple thousand dollars after they've went without healthcare for most of a year or have paid an additional $500+ a month for it is a wonderful idea and sure to crush a blue wave. A real "I did that!" moment for the President to take credit for a reason people are angry.
November 24, 2025 at 4:38 PM
You sure? The Cybertruck being parked far away from the other cars so they won't be damaged when it catches fire appears realistic.
November 24, 2025 at 6:20 AM
He didn't make a 'football move' after he was down with contact.

LOL
November 24, 2025 at 2:01 AM
Does this mean they're going to defund public water supplies, roads, hospitals, police, firefighters and the military?
November 21, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Have they tried giving them to a second grader?
November 21, 2025 at 4:05 AM
Love to hear why they think 'anti-racism' is bad.
November 20, 2025 at 10:59 PM
I'm betting it was "You get to put US Attorney on your CV."
November 20, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Yep. That's why career prosecutors are important. But she's doing this (allegedly) because the career prosecutors wouldn't.
November 19, 2025 at 11:46 PM
C'mon, sometimes the President has to work the phones...
November 19, 2025 at 11:29 PM
Curious why you say Halligan should have known the practice in DC. I'm under the impression she hasn't worked as a prosecutor or public defender before.
November 19, 2025 at 11:26 PM
The new information? Congress is going to pass a law requiring the Epstein files be released.
November 19, 2025 at 10:53 PM