Right - during the Great Depression for instance, it became official US policy to artificially *increase* the price of wheat and other ag staples so that farmers didn’t go broke.

(Don’t hate me but) in a sense you could argue he “revolutionized” Labour by dragging it to the right & embracing neoliberalism, couldn’t you?

In this essay I will, etc.

watch house leadership support him just like they did with no-name Kennedy kid last time

so much of what this administration is doing is based on creating the perception that he is inevitable and unstoppable and it’s not true and he can lose and it’s important that people see that because the only way he does win is if everyone gives up

Canceling Jimmy Kimmel show is not about Charlie Kirk, just like going after universities was not about antisemitism and occupying DC was not about fighting crime.

Honestly, I think he *does* understand that - it’s just that he thinks the way for liberals to win back power will be thru traditional methods, and if we don’t, it’s because oopsie authoritarianism was just more popular and liberals should accept that + change if we ever want to win again.