Daryl Janzen
@darylj.bsky.social
physicist/cosmologist trying to understand what reality is. don’t understand fragile egos: valid correction is a gift.
cosmiCave.org
cosmiCave.org
A second (related) issue:
Physicists interpret collapse using picture (b)—a naive Cartesian reading of a non-Euclidean geometry, described in one coordinate basis, projected onto a Euclidean plane, and then taken to represent ontological reality.
But GR only gives us (a) (7/)
Physicists interpret collapse using picture (b)—a naive Cartesian reading of a non-Euclidean geometry, described in one coordinate basis, projected onto a Euclidean plane, and then taken to represent ontological reality.
But GR only gives us (a) (7/)
November 13, 2025 at 10:09 PM
A second (related) issue:
Physicists interpret collapse using picture (b)—a naive Cartesian reading of a non-Euclidean geometry, described in one coordinate basis, projected onto a Euclidean plane, and then taken to represent ontological reality.
But GR only gives us (a) (7/)
Physicists interpret collapse using picture (b)—a naive Cartesian reading of a non-Euclidean geometry, described in one coordinate basis, projected onto a Euclidean plane, and then taken to represent ontological reality.
But GR only gives us (a) (7/)
Why is b always interpreted as the story? It takes a non-Euclidean geometry, describes it in one coordinate frame, projects it onto a Euclidean plane, then makes a Cartesian reading. I think c is a more compelling story, avoids paradox — and GR does not discriminate!! Ie GR only gives us a.
🧪 ⚛️ 🔭
🧪 ⚛️ 🔭
November 12, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Why is b always interpreted as the story? It takes a non-Euclidean geometry, describes it in one coordinate frame, projects it onto a Euclidean plane, then makes a Cartesian reading. I think c is a more compelling story, avoids paradox — and GR does not discriminate!! Ie GR only gives us a.
🧪 ⚛️ 🔭
🧪 ⚛️ 🔭