Does anybody have a clue if John Searle is still alive?

I was going to berate you/them for implying they knew cognitive I thought it was but was the paper too interesting

Outside of the crazies I dont see this very often. Ie people deservedly scrutinizing psychology then inferring physics is also not worth pursuing or funding. Maybe im wrong though, would love to see examples

I suppose that's fair and i wouldnt attack science as an enterprise. However, I wasn't really referring to "fake" science so much as bad science - which is obviously hard to put an objective number on. And I'm also bias being in psychology/psychiatry which atleast somebody has memeified

Seems kinda strawmany as ive never heard any make that generalization. However, i didnt listen to the podcast so maybe im missing the reference. Clearly alot of variation between fields though either way it seems.

I don't really understand you're arguing for here. You're seemingly acknowledging at least some fields are largely capable of a lot of junk science - but other scientists or people shouldn't call them out for it because it aligns with some right-wing pundits narratives? And thus should instead...?

That which people whom I don't like are typically bad at

Definitely seems to be the case

Wish I were able to have more conversations with such overly-confident neuroscience people !

How many times have you been told the cerebellum was probably going to be simple?

Separate Ways though, for sure . That music video is also one of the funniest in history

Fair enough. That choice still wouldn't make it on my top 5 journey songs though.

Fleetwood? :) Would be my choice, even though not very high on my list.

Those are mostly terrible songs, yikes

Amen.

that study was done with beta-blockers just for context :)