The case has never been strong enough to take wealth from the rich. Because if the promises of AI materialize, a majority would be perpetually thrown into a life of exclusion and ostracization, enforced by the robots of the rich.

This whole utopia promise is a deception.

Nothing about their trajectory suggests the rich will change.

This future won’t be utopia. It will be exclusion. The robots would use control to keep the deprived at bay. Those who will fight back would be called criminals. Then the whole automated machines suite would be unleashed.

Resources will concentrate at the top, not get shared. The elites will use advanced tech to extend their own lifespans while automated systems keep everyone else out.

And if I’m wrong, just look at Bezos and Musk right now, they just keep accumulating obscene amounts of wealth into the trillions.

Attacking the Fed Chair only pushes rates up. Markets see it as politicizing the Fed, which weakens confidence in inflation control. Less credibility = higher expected deficits = higher yields. Trying to bully the Fed usually backfires.

Attacking the Fed Chair only pushes rates up. Markets see it as politicizing the Fed, which weakens confidence in inflation control. Less credibility = higher expected deficits = higher yields. Trying to bully the Fed usually backfires.

Attacking the Fed Chair only pushes rates up. Markets see it as politicizing the Fed, which weakens confidence in inflation control. Less credibility = higher expected deficits = higher yields. Trying to bully the Fed usually backfires.

Doing a PhD from Oxford is not a small achievement. Doing Masters was excruciatingly hard. Love Oxford, the sort of skills it gives are beyond any measure. Congratulations.