Sorry, das ist Nius Niveau. Stellt Politiker inhaltlich, das ist in diesem Fall doch wirklich möglich. Aber beschwert Euch nicht über Privilegien für Frau Reiche, die genauso für die von Euch präferierten Politker(innen) gelten. Und sowas wie GasKaethe ist nicht besser als CrookedHillary.

papers one published in the previous year * 2 - that should be the number or reviews one is doing, at least for those with stable positions. But consider that many who decline receive 50-100 invitations per year.

Data source and code are of course freely available. And hopefully a useful source for future predictive models in aquatic stress ecology.

And we can now also align species richness to combinations of stressors (Fig 4):

We observed consistent relation with salinity, oxygen depletion, and fine sediment accumulation, while the relation with nutrient enrichment and warming varied among groups. The results allow us, amongst others, to predict how species richness changes with increasing stressors intensity (Fig. 3):

The figure (1a) shows the probability distribution on how species number of the different organism groups are associated with increasing stress intensity. Invertebrates are generally most sensitive and species number is negatively associated to six of the stressors.

We extracted data on 1,332 stressor–response relationships from literature and ran Generalised Linear Mixed Models for each dataset individually. With the resulting estimates (e.g. regression coefficients) we performed a Bayesian meta-analysis.
In short, these are the results:

Yes, that's the majority. Only very few want to send me large amounts of money.

Wishful thinking, right? It's true that many scientists are here and easily gain high numbers of followers. But interaction is minimal. Better nail your paper on a tree in a deep forest, it will attract more attention.