all the way down to the irony of an equivalent to speakeasys, or just 1984, who knows at this point?

Also, feel free to apply all of this to any other censorship laws like the "Kids online safety act" over in the UK

(also sorry if this is phrased weirdly, I have autism)

let alone how this isn't going to effect sites that already break the law.

Welp thanks for reading my brief explanation on how these laws will, support PDF files if anything.

Cause that can be used to narrow down children and well, The moment they gain contact with children we might as well have lost given how they rarely admit to being abused (70 to 90% according to google AI).

mind you this is ignoring how often its disclosed years after when it happens.

But that's getting off point, S. 1748 and S. 737 will make children less safe and are begging for another Epstein to show up and bribe less officials and more CEOs for their ID databases.

To clarify I'm not gonna talk about the stuff everyone else has pointed out, if you want to know look into it on Youtube while you can without being categorized by AI.

Why don't I point out something no one seems to be noting about the recent S. 1748 and S. 737, If anything these make children less safe on the internet.

Understood and seconded