In our own Shadow Report, we offer a way forward: to combat antisemitism in a way that safeguards bedrock democratic principles of equality, free speech, academic freedom, and due
process.

www.concernedjewishfaculty.org/commission-s...

Excellent longform piece on weaponization of antisemitism, in MA and elsewhere, by @tomdispatch.bsky.social

Members of @upenn.edu community can join this petition to support its Jewish community against Trump threats.

actionnetwork.org/petitions/st...

@aaup-penn.bsky.social

Remember: Trump's antisemitism investigations of universities are being prosecuted by Hitler fans.

They are doing antisemitism under cover of fighting antisemitism

www.bostonglobe.com/2025/09/02/m...

CJFS member Ben Allen: The Commission "has not been responsive to the community it purports to protect. We are Jewish orgs too: @workerscircle.bsky.social , CJFS, @ifnotnowmovement.org , @jvp.bsky.social , MA Synagogue Network on Israel-Palestine, @rabbis4ceasefire.bsky.social & many more.”

This is the problem in equating criticism of a country with bias against its people. Not only is it logically and morally wrong, but it leads to some very disturbing implications. Is the message here that all countries should be free of criticism or consequences for their actions?

Our Shadow Report outlines best practices for combating antisemitism without undermining the rights of other groups, and highlights the misinformation, biases, and false assumptions that drove the Commission's approach

drive.google.com/file/d/1GqhR...

In a number of cases, anonymous single-paragraph complaints, with no supporting evidence provided, spurred full-scale Title VI investigations.

“Government civil rights enforcement is now being driven by the equivalent of a YouTube comment section.”

www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...