If you _do_ want to know the true science on the environmental consequences of offshore wind development, we did a story based on two different systematic reviews, plus a bunch of other studies, in this piece:

hakaimagazine.com/news/offshor...

If you like a writer's work, tell them! Email, LinkedIn message, DM, even in person at an event. It can make a huge difference in their lives, especially right now with declining freelance budgets, layoffs, stagnant salaries, the threat of AI, and dwindling book advances.

If you _do_ want to know the true science on the environmental consequences of offshore wind development, we did a story based on two different systematic reviews, plus a bunch of other studies, in this piece:

hakaimagazine.com/news/offshor...

Here's that link. The money will go directly toward helping us report, edit, and publish stories and photographs about under-appreciated species, incredible places, and the people protecting them both.

Thank you!

Respectfully, I tend to disagree with that point. I think data should make its way into a story sparingly, as walls of stats and numbers tend to lose audiences. IMO it's far more important to articulate the research's findings and flaws in a way people grasp without needing the data itself

The paper behind it seems to be open access www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...