You going live on Substack?

You never disappoint! Love this entire thread. Brava. 🫶🏻

lol

I wanted to express my sincere gratitude for taking the time to explain the judge's ruling to me. Your ability to break down the complex legal terms into language I could easily understand was incredibly valuable and greatly relieved my concerns. 🫶🏻

Sure. The judge finds that the proper thing to do is to rewind the hands of time back to the point Comey found himself BEFORE Halligan was unlawfully appointed. So w/o presence. It also means that Comey’s other motions to dismiss can and will be addressed in the event they try to re-indict him.

Mansplaining is so 'helpful.'

Hi Katie - I would love your input on why the case was dismissed without prejudice. Could you please break down the legal reasoning behind this specific ruling? TY

Allison - why would the judge dismiss the case WITHOUT prejudice?

OMG! 😂😂 🙌🏻

🙌

Such a piggy.

Same ☕️